Literature DB >> 15940688

Development of an audit tool for genetic services.

Heather Skirton1, Evelyn Parsons, Paul Ewings.   

Abstract

Rapid growth in demand and altered professional roles have produced changes in the delivery of genetic services over the past decade, but these have not been rigorously evaluated because of the paucity of appropriate audit tools. The aim of this study was to use clients' accounts and factor analysis to develop a robust assessment and audit tool. Qualitative data abstracted from several published studies were used to generate a number of statements related to outcomes of genetic services. A total of 57 statements were incorporated into a questionnaire. The questionnaire was mailed to clients of the Wales genetic service (n = 133) who had completed their episode of care. Respondents were asked to rank each statement on a seven-point Likert type scale. Responses were subjected to factor analysis. A total of 97 anonymized responses were received (73% response rate). Six main factors were found to contribute to the outcome of the service from the client's perspective. These were labeled (i) enhanced understanding, (ii) positive psychological change, (iii) respect for autonomy, (iv) adaptation, (v) disequilibirium, and (vi) value of contact. The audit tool has now been refined for use in evaluating genetic services. Questions are included to investigate the six outcome areas shown to be relevant from the client's perspective. Data from the next phase of the study will be analyzed to validate the tool for use in both clinical audit and research contexts. Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15940688     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  5 in total

1.  Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Fair allocation of health-care resources: finding a model that does not disenfranchise users of genetic services. A commentary on Rogowski et al....

Authors:  Heather Skirton
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  What counts as effective genetic counselling for presymptomatic testing in late-onset disorders? A study of the consultand's perspective.

Authors:  Lídia Guimarães; Jorge Sequeiros; Heather Skirton; Milena Paneque
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Defining Our Clinical Practice: The Identification of Genetic Counseling Outcomes Utilizing the Reciprocal Engagement Model.

Authors:  Krista Redlinger-Grosse; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Stephanie Cohen; Bonnie S LeRoy; Ian M MacFarlane; Heather Zierhut
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Quality Improvement in Clinical Genetics: an Exploratory Study.

Authors:  A Costal Tirado; A M McDermott; C Thomas; D Ferrick; J Harris; A Edwards; Marion McAllister
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.537

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.