Literature DB >> 15940684

Preparation of cells cultured on silicon wafers for mass spectrometry analysis.

Andrea Wittig1, Martin Wiemann, Michael Fartmann, Christian Kriegeskotte, Heinrich F Arlinghaus, Karl Zierold, Wolfgang Sauerwein.   

Abstract

The distribution of specific atoms and molecules within living cells is of high interest in bio-medical research. Laser secondary neutral mass spectrometry (laser-SNMS) and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (TOF-SIMS) detect atoms with high sensitivity and spatial resolution. The application of these methods to cultured cells requires special preparation techniques preserving morphological and chemical integrity of the living cells. The cells should, therefore, be grown on a conducting material preventing charging of the sample during ion bombardment. Silicon is currently used as the preferred support material for non-biological samples in mass spectrometry. This study investigates (1) the influence of silicon surfaces on cell growth and (2) the suitability of a sandwiched, rapid freezing method to analyse transmembrane ion gradients. Human melanoma cells were grown on silicon with polished or etched surfaces. Growth kinetics were studied using the Sulforhodamine-B assay. Number, shape, and morphology of the cells were assessed by epifluorescence microscopy of calcein AM- and DAPI-stained cells. Cells were subjected to rapid freezing, freeze-fracturing, and freeze-drying prior to analysis by TOF-SIMS and laser-SNMS. While cell numbers and morphology on the rough silicon wafers were impaired, morphology and growth kinetics of cells on polished silicon were identical to control cells on cell culture tested polystyrene. TOF-SIMS and laser-SNMS resulted in high-resolution elemental images and mass spectra. Measurement of the intracellular Na+ and K+ concentrations revealed a ratio as observed in living cells. In conclusion, culturing cells on polished silicon wafers followed by sandwiched, rapid freezing is an adequate preparation method to study intracellular ion distribution with mass spectrometry. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15940684     DOI: 10.1002/jemt.20159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microsc Res Tech        ISSN: 1059-910X            Impact factor:   2.769


  6 in total

1.  ToF-SIMS depth profiling of cells: z-correction, 3D imaging, and sputter rate of individual NIH/3T3 fibroblasts.

Authors:  Michael A Robinson; Daniel J Graham; David G Castner
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Label-free optical detection of peptide synthesis on a porous silicon scaffold/sensor.

Authors:  Patrick Furbert; Caiyan Lu; Nicholas Winograd; Lisa DeLouise
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 3.882

3.  Chapter 13: Imaging of cells and tissues with mass spectrometry: adding chemical information to imaging.

Authors:  Tyler A Zimmerman; Eric B Monroe; Kevin R Tucker; Stanislav S Rubakhin; Jonathan V Sweedler
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.441

4.  Compositional mapping of the surface and interior of mammalian cells at submicrometer resolution.

Authors:  Christopher Szakal; Kedar Narayan; Jing Fu; Jonathan Lefman; Sriram Subramaniam
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Assessment of different sample preparation routes for mass spectrometric monitoring and imaging of lipids in bone cells via ToF-SIMS.

Authors:  Kaija Schaepe; Julia Kokesch-Himmelreich; Marcus Rohnke; Alena-Svenja Wagner; Thimo Schaaf; Sabine Wenisch; Jürgen Janek
Journal:  Biointerphases       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 2.456

6.  Characterization of sample preparation methods of NIH/3T3 fibroblasts for ToF-SIMS analysis.

Authors:  Michael A Robinson; David G Castner
Journal:  Biointerphases       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 2.456

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.