Literature DB >> 15940643

Molecular analysis to detect pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in high-risk groups.

Li Yan1, Christopher McFaul, Nathan Howes, Jane Leslie, Gillian Lancaster, Theresa Wong, Jane Threadgold, Jonathan Evans, Ian Gilmore, Howard Smart, Martin Lombard, John Neoptolemos, William Greenhalf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Screening of high-risk groups for pancreatic cancer has not been adopted because of concerns regarding specificity and sensitivity. Suitability of a combination of 3 novel molecular screening techniques was investigated.
METHODS: Pancreatic juice was extracted from 146 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, chronic pancreatitis, or biliary tract stones. p53 mutations were analyzed by using a modified yeast functional assay, K-ras status was analyzed using mutation-specific real-time PCR and the proportion of p16(INK4a) promoter methylation was estimated using comparative methylation-specific real-time PCR.
RESULTS: p53 mutations were detected in 20 of 48 (42%) cancer cases, none of 49 controls, and 2 of 49 (4%) patients with pancreatitis. K-ras mutations were detected in 31 of 57 (54%) cancer patients, 13 of 61 (21%) controls, and 23 of 67 (34%) patients with pancreatitis. Twenty-six of 42 (62%) cancer patients had promoter methylation levels > 12%, compared with 3 of 24 (13%) controls, and 2 of 26 (8%) with pancreatitis. Mutations in p53 or high-level p16(INK4a) promoter methylation occurred in 29 of 36 (80%) patients with cancer, 3 of 24 (13%) controls, and 3 of 22 (13%) with pancreatitis. Three patients (8%) of 36 with cancer; 14 of 24 (58%) controls, and 13 of 22 (59%) patients with pancreatitis had no marker. The gallstone disease patients had a high rate of positive K-ras mutations, possibly reflecting the fact that they were not disease free.
CONCLUSIONS: Combination molecular analysis increased the discrimination between patients with malignant and benign disease. This level of discrimination would allow patients in high-risk groups to be stratified from negligible risk to over 50% probability of an early cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15940643     DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  44 in total

1.  An NF-κB pathway-mediated positive feedback loop amplifies Ras activity to pathological levels in mice.

Authors:  Jaroslaw Daniluk; Yan Liu; Defeng Deng; Jun Chu; Haojie Huang; Sebastian Gaiser; Zobeida Cruz-Monserrate; Huamin Wang; Baoan Ji; Craig D Logsdon
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 2.  Identifying molecular markers for the early detection of pancreatic neoplasia.

Authors:  Michael Goggins
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 3.  An unfavourable prognosis for pancreatic cancer indicates fields of opportunity.

Authors:  W Greenhalf
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  The pancreatic cancer genome revisited.

Authors:  Akimasa Hayashi; Jungeui Hong; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 46.802

5.  Advances in counselling and surveillance of patients at risk for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Randall E Brand; Markus M Lerch; Wendy S Rubinstein; John P Neoptolemos; David C Whitcomb; Ralph H Hruban; Teresa A Brentnall; Henry T Lynch; Marcia I Canto
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  Biology and management of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Paula Ghaneh; Eithne Costello; John P Neoptolemos
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  KRAS and guanine nucleotide-binding protein mutations in pancreatic juice collected from the duodenum of patients at high risk for neoplasia undergoing endoscopic ultrasound.

Authors:  James R Eshleman; Alexis L Norris; Yoshihiko Sadakari; Marija Debeljak; Michael Borges; Colleen Harrington; Elaine Lin; Aaron Brant; Thomas Barkley; J Alejandro Almario; Mark Topazian; James Farrell; Sapna Syngal; Jeffrey H Lee; Jun Yu; Ralph H Hruban; Mitsuro Kanda; Marcia Irene Canto; Michael Goggins
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  Interleukin-6 is required for pancreatic cancer progression by promoting MAPK signaling activation and oxidative stress resistance.

Authors:  Yaqing Zhang; Wei Yan; Meredith A Collins; Filip Bednar; Sabita Rakshit; Bruce R Zetter; Ben Z Stanger; Ivy Chung; Andrew D Rhim; Marina Pasca di Magliano
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  p53: a molecular marker for the detection of cancer.

Authors:  Mark T Boyd; Nikolina Vlatkovic
Journal:  Expert Opin Med Diagn       Date:  2008-09

10.  Genome-wide association study of pancreatic cancer in Japanese population.

Authors:  Siew-Kee Low; Aya Kuchiba; Hitoshi Zembutsu; Akira Saito; Atsushi Takahashi; Michiaki Kubo; Yataro Daigo; Naoyuki Kamatani; Suenori Chiku; Hirohiko Totsuka; Sumiko Ohnami; Hiroshi Hirose; Kazuaki Shimada; Takuji Okusaka; Teruhiko Yoshida; Yusuke Nakamura; Hiromi Sakamoto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.