Literature DB >> 15940573

[LED autoregistration in navigated endonasal sinus surgery].

I Arapakis1, U Hubbe, W Maier, R Laszig, J Schipper.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In endonasal sinus surgery, computer aided surgery (CAS) is a generally accepted method. Applying CAS, there are basic problems with the constancy of accuracy at a free mobile patient head as well as with extended referencing time. The navigation system manufacturer Stryker-Leibinger invented together with our working group a non-invasive, frameless, automatic patient registration and simultaneous tracking system for navigated endonasal sinus surgery. With this new user-friendly system it concerns an active, LED-based, self-adhesive on the surface of splanchnocranium autoregistration mask. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: The LED autoregistration mask was tested in an anatomic cadaver study and an ongoing clinical patient study regarding manageability, applicability and accuracy. Accuracy measurements were accomplished on different control points of the head in the cadaver study. The determination of accuracy was calculated with the metric Euclidean distance. Further we report on our experiences with a total of 20 patients applying the new mask. To control the accuracy, anatomic landmarks of the patients were adducted. Goal of our study was to determine the accuracy of the LED mask and to compare it with titanium screw markers, the valid reference gold standard.
RESULTS: The LED autoregistration mask convinced by a high precision with relatively simple useability. Total accuracy amounted to 2.22 +/- 0.91 mm. The LED system proved to be a valuable orientation guide mainly at revision surgeries with modified anatomy.
CONCLUSIONS: LED surface autoregistration is especially suitable for endonasal sinus surgery and represents a very helpful tool for the rhinosurgeon. Our accuracy studies have shown that the LED autoregistration mask is comparable to the gold standard titanium screw markers and, in addition, very reliable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15940573     DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-825998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie        ISSN: 0935-8943            Impact factor:   1.057


  5 in total

1.  [New developments in navigation technology].

Authors:  O Majdani; M Leinung; R Heermann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Registration using 3D-printed rigid templates outperforms manually scanned surface matching in image-guided temporal bone surgery.

Authors:  Makoto Yamashita; Nozomu Matsumoto; Byunghyun Cho; Noritaka Komune; Shinya Onogi; Jongseung Lee; Jordan Bano; Tomohiko Akahoshi; Makoto Hashizume
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Prospects and limitations of different registration modalities in electromagnetic ENT navigation.

Authors:  Eric Soteriou; Juergen Grauvogel; Roland Laszig; Tanja Daniela Grauvogel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  [Modified procedure for patient registration for navigation control instruments in ENT surgery].

Authors:  G Strauss; C Spitzer; E Dittrich; M Hofer; M Strauss; T Lüth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Navigation accuracy after automatic- and hybrid-surface registration in sinus and skull base surgery.

Authors:  Tanja Daniela Grauvogel; Paul Engelskirchen; Wiebke Semper-Hogg; Juergen Grauvogel; Roland Laszig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.