Literature DB >> 15940380

An autosomal dominant high bone mass phenotype in association with craniosynostosis in an extended family is caused by an LRP5 missense mutation.

Mei Lan Kwee1, Wendy Balemans, Erna Cleiren, Johan J P Gille, Frits Van Der Blij, Jan M Sepers, Wim Van Hul.   

Abstract

Gain-of-function mutations in LRP5 have been shown to cause high BMD disorders showing variable expression of some clinical symptoms, including torus palatinus and neurological complications. In an extended family, we were able to add craniosynostosis and developmental delay to the clinical spectrum associated with LRP5 mutations. We report on an extended four-generation family with 13 affected individuals (7 men and 6 women) in which an autosomal dominant type of osteosclerosis segregates. Osteosclerosis was most pronounced in the cranial base and calvarium, starting in early childhood with variable expression and a progressive character. Craniosynostosis at an early age was reported in four affected family members (two males and two females). The patients also presented with dysmorphic features (macrocephaly, brachycephaly, wide and high forehead, hypertelorism, prominent cheekbones, prominent jaw). They have normal height and proportions. Neurological complications like entrapment of cranial nerves resulting in optical nerve atrophy, hearing loss, and facial palsy were reported in two individuals. A mild developmental delay was reported in three affected individuals. None of the patients have torus palatinus, increased rate of fractures, osteomyelitis, hepatosplenomegaly, or pancytopenia. A missense mutation 640G-->A (A214T) in the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) gene was found in all affected individuals analyzed, including cases in whom craniosynostosis, a mild developmental delay, and/or macrocephaly is observed. To our knowledge, this is the first report in the literature of patients presenting with autosomal dominant osteosclerosis in whom a variable expression of craniosynostosis, macrocephaly, and mild developmental delay is observed, which is most likely associated with a mutation in the LRP5 gene. These phenotypes can therefore be added to the clinical spectrum of LRP5-associated bone disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15940380     DOI: 10.1359/JBMR.050303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  9 in total

1.  The effect of a Beare-Stevenson syndrome Fgfr2 Y394C mutation on early craniofacial bone volume and relative bone mineral density in mice.

Authors:  Christopher J Percival; Yingli Wang; Xueyan Zhou; Ethylin W Jabs; Joan T Richtsmeier
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Canonical Wnt signalling activates TAZ through PP1A during osteogenic differentiation.

Authors:  M R Byun; J-H Hwang; A R Kim; K M Kim; E S Hwang; M B Yaffe; J-H Hong
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 15.828

3.  Wnt5a can both activate and repress Wnt/β-catenin signaling during mouse embryonic development.

Authors:  Renée van Amerongen; Christophe Fuerer; Makiko Mizutani; Roel Nusse
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 4.  Signaling Pathways in Bone Development and Their Related Skeletal Dysplasia.

Authors:  Alessandra Guasto; Valérie Cormier-Daire
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  The Wnt Co-Receptor Lrp5 Is Required for Cranial Neural Crest Cell Migration in Zebrafish.

Authors:  Bernd Willems; Shijie Tao; Tingsheng Yu; Ann Huysseune; Paul Eckhard Witten; Christoph Winkler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  WNT Signaling and Bone: Lessons From Skeletal Dysplasias and Disorders.

Authors:  Yentl Huybrechts; Geert Mortier; Eveline Boudin; Wim Van Hul
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 7.  Friend or foe: high bone mineral density on routine bone density scanning, a review of causes and management.

Authors:  Celia L Gregson; Sarah A Hardcastle; Cyrus Cooper; Jonathan H Tobias
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 7.580

8.  Mutations in Known Monogenic High Bone Mass Loci Only Explain a Small Proportion of High Bone Mass Cases.

Authors:  Celia L Gregson; Lawrie Wheeler; Sarah A Hardcastle; Louise H Appleton; Kathryn A Addison; Marieke Brugmans; Graeme R Clark; Kate A Ward; Margaret Paggiosi; Mike Stone; Joegi Thomas; Rohan Agarwal; Kenneth E S Poole; Eugene McCloskey; William D Fraser; Eleanor Williams; Alex N Bullock; George Davey Smith; Matthew A Brown; Jon H Tobias; Emma L Duncan
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 9.  The Genetic Architecture of High Bone Mass.

Authors:  Celia L Gregson; Emma L Duncan
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 5.555

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.