Linda M Rasmussen1, Klaus Phanareth, Hendrik Nolte, Vibeke Backer. 1. Respiratory and Allergy Research Unit, Department of University Medicine 1, University Hospital of Copenhagen, H:S Bispebjerg Hospital, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400 Copenhagen NV, Denmark. makowska@dadlnet.dk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Experience from other fields of internal medicine shows that Internet-based technology can be used to monitor various diseases. The new technology handles complex calculation programs easily, and it is a unique way of communicating. These advantages might be used in optimizing the treatment for asthmatic subjects because undertreatment is a common problem found in European asthmatic subjects. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the outcome of monitoring and treatment using a physician-managed online interactive asthma monitoring tool and to assess whether the outcome differs from that of monitoring and treatment in an outpatient respiratory clinic or in primary care. METHODS:Three hundred asthmatic subjects were randomized to 3 parallel groups in a 6-month prospective study: (1) Internet-based monitoring (n = 100); (2) specialist monitoring (n = 100); and (3) general practitioner (GP) monitoring (n = 100). All the patients were examined on entry into the study and after 6 months of treatment. RESULTS: The treatment and monitoring with the Internet-based management tool lead to significantly better improvement in the Internet group than in the other 2 groups regarding asthma symptoms (Internet vs specialist: odds ratio of 2.64, P = .002; Internet vs GP: odds ratio of 3.26; P < .001), quality of life (Internet vs specialist: odds ratio of 2.21, P = .03; Internet vs GP: odds ratio of 2.10, P = .04), lung function (Internet vs specialist: odds ratio of 3.26, P = .002; Internet vs GP: odds ratio of 4.86, P < .001), and airway responsiveness (Internet vs GP: odds ratio of 3.06, P = .02). CONCLUSION: When physicians and patients used an interactive Internet-based asthma monitoring tool, better asthma control was achieved.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Experience from other fields of internal medicine shows that Internet-based technology can be used to monitor various diseases. The new technology handles complex calculation programs easily, and it is a unique way of communicating. These advantages might be used in optimizing the treatment for asthmatic subjects because undertreatment is a common problem found in European asthmatic subjects. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the outcome of monitoring and treatment using a physician-managed online interactive asthma monitoring tool and to assess whether the outcome differs from that of monitoring and treatment in an outpatient respiratory clinic or in primary care. METHODS: Three hundred asthmatic subjects were randomized to 3 parallel groups in a 6-month prospective study: (1) Internet-based monitoring (n = 100); (2) specialist monitoring (n = 100); and (3) general practitioner (GP) monitoring (n = 100). All the patients were examined on entry into the study and after 6 months of treatment. RESULTS: The treatment and monitoring with the Internet-based management tool lead to significantly better improvement in the Internet group than in the other 2 groups regarding asthma symptoms (Internet vs specialist: odds ratio of 2.64, P = .002; Internet vs GP: odds ratio of 3.26; P < .001), quality of life (Internet vs specialist: odds ratio of 2.21, P = .03; Internet vs GP: odds ratio of 2.10, P = .04), lung function (Internet vs specialist: odds ratio of 3.26, P = .002; Internet vs GP: odds ratio of 4.86, P < .001), and airway responsiveness (Internet vs GP: odds ratio of 3.06, P = .02). CONCLUSION: When physicians and patients used an interactive Internet-based asthma monitoring tool, better asthma control was achieved.
Authors: Robert S Rudin; Christopher H Fanta; Nabeel Qureshi; Erin Duffy; Maria O Edelen; Anuj K Dalal; David W Bates Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2019-10-16 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: James B Weaver; Darren Mays; Gregg Lindner; Dogan Eroglu; Frederick Fridinger; Jay M Bernhardt Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2009-06-30 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Amblessed E Onuma; Elizabeth Palmer Kelly; Jeffery Chakedis; Anghela Z Paredes; Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Brianne Wiemann; Morgan Johnson; Katiuscha Merath; Ozgur Akgul; Jordan Cloyd; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: Surgery Date: 2019-02-13 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Susan K Peterson; Eileen H Shinn; Karen Basen-Engquist; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Alexander V Prokhorov; Chaitanya Baru; Ingolf H Krueger; Emilia Farcas; Philip Rios; Adam S Garden; Beth M Beadle; Kai Lin; Yan Yan; Stephanie L Martch; Kevin Patrick Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr Date: 2013-12
Authors: Kurt Nikander; John Denyer; Mary Dodd; Tony Dyche; Kevin Webb; Peter Weller; David Stableforth Journal: J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 2.849
Authors: N Kearney; L McCann; J Norrie; L Taylor; P Gray; M McGee-Lennon; M Sage; M Miller; R Maguire Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2008-10-25 Impact factor: 3.603