Literature DB >> 15939621

Comparison of minimally invasive closed circuit extracorporeal circulation with conventional cardiopulmonary bypass and with off-pump technique in CABG patients: selected parameters of coagulation and inflammatory system.

Jens Wippermann1, Johannes M Albes, Martin Hartrumpf, Mirko Kaluza, Rüdiger Vollandt, Raimund Bruhin, Thorsten Wahlers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Closed circuit extracorporeal circulation (CCECC) has been developed to reduce deleterious effects of standard cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). This study compares the effects of CCECC (CORx system), CPB, and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) on red blood cell damage, coagulation activation, fibrinolysis and cytokine expression.
METHODS: Thirty patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Twenty of them were randomized into two groups: CCECC (n = 10), CPB (n = 10). While not randomized, OPCAB (n = 10) served as a separate reference group. CCECC and CPB patients received cardioplegic arrest. Interleukin 6 (IL-6), free hemoglobin (fHb), von Willebrand factor activity (vWf), thrombin-antithrombin-III-complex (TATc), prothrombin fragment 1.2 (F 1+2) and plasmin-antiplasmin complex (PAPc) were assessed preoperatively, perioperatively and 24 h postoperatively.
RESULTS: CCECC showed significantly lower red blood cell damage than CPB (fHb: CCECC, 7.1+/- 5.7 micromol/l; CPB, 16.8+/-11.4 micromol/l; P = 0.025; OPCAB, 3.4+/-1.1 micromol/l). Perioperatively, CCECC exhibited significantly lower activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis than CPB, but did not differ from OPCAB (vWf: CCECC, 133+/-52%; CPB, 241+/-128%; P = 0.052; OPCAB, 153+/-58%; TATc: CCECC, 4.7+/-0.9 ng/ml; CPB, 31.1+/-15.8 ng/ml; P < 0.001; OPCAB, 2.4+/-0.6 ng/ml; PAPc: CCECC, 214+/-30 ng/ml; CPB, 897+/-367 ng/ml; P < 0.001; OPCAB, 253+/-98 ng/ml). In contrast, fibrinolysis markers and IL-6 were markedly increased in CCECC postoperatively (PAPc: CCECC, 458+/-98 ng/ml; CPB, 159+/-128 ng/ml; P < 0.001; OPCAB, 262+/-174 ng/ml; IL-6: CCECC, 123.4+/-49.8 pg/dl; CPB, 18.8+/-13.1 pg/dl; P < 0.001; OPCAB, 31.6+/-26.2 pg/dl).
CONCLUSIONS: CCECC for CABG is associated with a significant reduction of red blood cell damage and activation of coagulation cascades similar to OPCAB when compared with conventional CPB while a delayed fibrinolytic and inflammatory activity was observed. These findings require further investigation to verify the promising concept of CCECC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15939621     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.03.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  11 in total

1.  [Fast track in cardiac surgery].

Authors:  M Strüber; M Winterhalter
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Evaluation of hemodynamic and regional tissue perfusion effects of minimized extracorporeal circulation (MECC).

Authors:  Adrian Bauer; Claudius Diez; Jens Schubel; Nagi El-Shouki; Dietrich Metz; T Eberle; Harald Hausmann
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2010-03

3.  Impact of minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation on coagulation-a randomized trial.

Authors:  Ivy Susanne Modrau; Debbie Richards Halle; Per Hostrup Nielsen; Hans Henrik Kimose; Jacob Raben Greisen; Michael Kremke; Anne-Mette Hvas
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 4.  Meta-analysis of interleukin 6, 8, and 10 between off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass groups.

Authors:  Fanbo Meng; Jianghong Ma; Wei Wang; Baisong Lin
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 3.363

5.  The effects of conventional extracorporeal circulation versus miniaturized extracorporeal circulation on microcirculation during cardiopulmonary bypass-assisted coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  Koray Yuruk; Rick Bezemer; Mariska Euser; Dan M J Milstein; Hilde H R de Geus; Evert W Scholten; Bas A J M de Mol; Can Ince
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-06-14

6.  Haemostasis alterations in coronary artery bypass grafting: comparison between the off-pump technique and a closed coated cardiopulmonary bypass system.

Authors:  Giuseppe Scrascia; Crescenzia Rotunno; Piero Guida; Manuela Conte; Lillà Amorese; Vito Margari; Luigi de Luca Tupputi Schinosa; Domenico Paparella
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-01-18

7.  A randomized study of coronary artery bypass surgery performed with the Resting Heart™ System utilizing a low vs a standard dosage of heparin.

Authors:  Johan Nilsson; Sara Scicluna; Gunnar Malmkvist; Leif Pierre; Lars Algotsson; Per Paulsson; Henrik Bjursten; Per Johnsson
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-08-21

8.  [Bedside thrombelastography. Cost reduction in cardiac surgery].

Authors:  G J Spalding; M Hartrumpf; T Sierig; N Oesberg; C G Kirschke; J M Albes
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  Minimally invasive cardiopulmonary bypass: does it really change the outcome?

Authors:  Marco Ranucci; Giuseppe Isgrò
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Comparison of new technology integrated and nonintegrated arterial filters used in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery: a randomized, prospective, and single blind study.

Authors:  Özgür Gürsu; Selim Isbir; Koray Ak; Fethullah Gerin; Sinan Arsan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.