Literature DB >> 15939334

Complex molecules: do they add value?

Paul Selzer1, Hans-Jörg Roth, Peter Ertl, Ansgar Schuffenhauer.   

Abstract

The concept of complexity in chemistry has received much interest in the research community. Various measures to assess molecular complexity have been published, ranging from abstract complexity definitions to very specific application-oriented definitions. In this article we focus on molecular complexity in relation to biological activity. Connectivity and feature-based structural descriptors have been evaluated with reference to their potential as complexity measures. Our goal was to discuss the potential of the complexity concept to support the drug discovery process, helping to design suitable lead candidates. The studies have shown that highly active compounds, on average, are more complex than inactive compounds. However, complexity must be balanced with other molecular properties because more complex molecules have a higher probability to exhibit pharmacokinetic problems.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15939334     DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2005.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol        ISSN: 1367-5931            Impact factor:   8.822


  9 in total

1.  The importance of molecular complexity in the design of screening libraries.

Authors:  Shahul H Nilar; Ngai Ling Ma; Thomas H Keller
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Quantifying structure and performance diversity for sets of small molecules comprising small-molecule screening collections.

Authors:  Paul A Clemons; J Anthony Wilson; Vlado Dančík; Sandrine Muller; Hyman A Carrinski; Bridget K Wagner; Angela N Koehler; Stuart L Schreiber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Skeletal and Appendage Diversity as Design Elements in the Synthesis of a Discovery Library of Nonaromatic Polycyclic 5-Iminooxazolidin-2-ones, Hydantoins, and Acylureas.

Authors:  S Werner; D M Turner; P G Chambers; K M Brummond
Journal:  Tetrahedron       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 2.457

4.  Cheminformatic comparison of approved drugs from natural product versus synthetic origins.

Authors:  Christopher F Stratton; David J Newman; Derek S Tan
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Amiloride as a new RNA-binding scaffold with activity against HIV-1 TAR.

Authors:  Neeraj N Patwardhan; Laura R Ganser; Gary J Kapral; Christopher S Eubanks; Janghyun Lee; Bharathwaj Sathyamoorthy; Hashim M Al-Hashimi; Amanda E Hargrove
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.597

6.  Nonpher: computational method for design of hard-to-synthesize structures.

Authors:  Milan Voršilák; Daniel Svozil
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 5.514

7.  Highly Stereoselective Synthesis of a Compound Collection Based on the Bicyclic Scaffolds of Natural Products.

Authors:  Murali Annamalai; Stanimira Hristeva; Martyna Bielska; Raquel Ortega; Kamal Kumar
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  SYBA: Bayesian estimation of synthetic accessibility of organic compounds.

Authors:  Milan Voršilák; Michal Kolář; Ivan Čmelo; Daniel Svozil
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 5.514

9.  Molecular Complexity Calculated by Fractal Dimension.

Authors:  Modest von Korff; Thomas Sander
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.