Literature DB >> 15937749

Reserve selection using nonlinear species distribution models.

Atte Moilanen1.   

Abstract

Reserve design is concerned with optimal selection of sites for new conservation areas. Spatial reserve design explicitly considers the spatial pattern of the proposed reserve network and the effects of that pattern on reserve cost and/or ability to maintain species there. The vast majority of reserve selection formulations have assumed a linear problem structure, which effectively means that the biological value of a potential reserve site does not depend on the pattern of selected cells. However, spatial population dynamics and autocorrelation cause the biological values of neighboring sites to be interdependent. Habitat degradation may have indirect negative effects on biodiversity in areas neighboring the degraded site as a result of, for example, negative edge effects or lower permeability for animal movement. In this study, I present a formulation and a spatial optimization algorithm for nonlinear reserve selection problems in grid-based landscapes that accounts for interdependent site values. The method is demonstrated using habitat maps and nonlinear habitat models for threatened birds in the Netherlands, and it is shown that near-optimal solutions are found for regions consisting of up to hundreds of thousands grid cells, a landscape size much larger than those commonly attempted even with linear reserve selection formulations.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15937749     DOI: 10.1086/430011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  4 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for Using Movement Science to Inform Biodiversity Policy.

Authors:  Philip S Barton; Pia E Lentini; Erika Alacs; Sana Bau; Yvonne M Buckley; Emma L Burns; Don A Driscoll; Lydia K Guja; Heini Kujala; José J Lahoz-Monfort; Alessio Mortelliti; Ran Nathan; Ross Rowe; Annabel L Smith
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  What Data to Use for Forest Conservation Planning? A Comparison of Coarse Open and Detailed Proprietary Forest Inventory Data in Finland.

Authors:  Joona Lehtomäki; Sakari Tuominen; Tuuli Toivonen; Antti Leinonen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A local optimization framework for addressing conservation conflicts in mosaic ecosystems.

Authors:  Shane Nowack; Chris T Bauch; Madhur Anand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Evaluation of the ecological niche model approach in spatial conservation prioritization.

Authors:  Fumiko Ishihama; Akio Takenaka; Hiroyuki Yokomizo; Taku Kadoya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.