Literature DB >> 15937612

Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results and patient satisfaction after Ferguson's hemorrhoidectomy.

Marc-Olivier Guenin1, Rachel Rosenthal, Beatrice Kern, Ralph Peterli, Markus von Flüe, Christoph Ackermann.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Perioperative morbidity and long-term results after hemorrhoidectomy (Ferguson's technique) were evaluated as a basis for comparison with new methods such as stapled hemorrhoidectomy.
METHODS: All records of patients who underwent conventional hemorrhoidectomy between January 1, 1993 and December 31, 1997 (five years) were retrospectively analyzed. The surgical technique was Ferguson closed hemorrhoidectomy. Long-term results were evaluated with a standardized questionnaire that was sent to all patients.
RESULTS: Five-hundred-fourteen patients (195 female, 319 male) with a mean age of 52 (range, 22-96) years were evaluated. Postoperatively, seven patients had a relevant hemorrhage, and two had to undergo reoperation (reoperation rate within 30 days, 0.4 percent). In 15 cases (3 percent) patients received urinary catheters for postoperative urinary retention. Mortality was 0 percent. The questionnaire was returned by 403 patients (78.4 percent). The mean follow-up was 4.7 (range, 2.1-7.8) years. The leading symptom was relieved in 275 patients (67.4 percent), ameliorated in 111 (27.2 percent), and unchanged or worse in 22 (5.4 percent). Incontinence (soiling) was not present in 291 (71.7 percent) patients, light in 86 (21.2 percent), moderate in 25 (6.1 percent), and severe in 4 (0.98 percent). Reoperation rate for recurrent hemorrhoids was 0.8 percent. Patients evaluated the surgical result as excellent in 286 (70.5 percent) cases, good in 87 (21.4 percent), moderate in 25 (6.2 percent), and bad in 8 (1.9 percent) cases.
CONCLUSION: Ferguson closed hemorrhoidectomy results in very low rates of perioperative morbidity. Long-term results demonstrate high patient satisfaction and low incontinence and reoperation rates. It could be the gold standard to which other techniques are compared.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15937612     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-005-0084-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  8 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Outcome Following Hemorrhoid Surgery: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Marcello Picchio; Ettore Greco; Annalisa Di Filippo; Giuseppe Marino; Francesco Stipa; Erasmo Spaziani
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 0.656

2.  Long-term outcomes after circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  E Aytac; E Gorgun; H H Erem; M A Abbas; T L Hull; F H Remzi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: is still the gold standard treatment?

Authors:  Marco Milone; Paola Maietta; Maddalena Leongito; Giuseppe Pesce; Giuseppe Salvatore; Francesco Milone
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2012-04-10

4.  Hemorrhoids.

Authors:  Amy Halverson
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-05

5.  The outcome of postoperative hemorrhaging following a hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Takaaki Yano; Yasuhide Matsuda; Michio Asano; Kazuhiko Kawakami; Katsuhiko Nakai; Masahiko Nonaka; Kouzou Kimura; Kazuhide Yoshihara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Stapled vs open hemorrhoidectomy: long-term outcome of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marcello Picchio; Domenico Palimento; Ugo Attanasio; Andrea Renda
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to epidural analgesia after abdominal surgery in elderly intensive care patients: A prospective, double-blind, clinical trial.

Authors:  Sule Akin; Anis Aribogan; Gulnaz Arslan
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2008-02

8.  An evaluation of Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson procedures for haemorrhoidectomy at Liaquat University Hospital Jamshoro, Hyderabad, Pakistan.

Authors:  Abdul Razaque Shaikh; Abdul Ghafoor Dalwani; Nasarullah Soomro
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.088

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.