UNLABELLED: Physiologic (18)F-FDG uptake in the stomach can often cause false-positive results and lowers the usefulness of (18)F-FDG PET in evaluating the remnant stomach. We assessed the role of gastric distension to see whether it is beneficial for the differentiation of recurrent tumors from physiologic (18)F-FDG uptake in the remnant stomach. METHODS: Thirty patients (22 men and 8 women; age range, 27-80 y; mean age, 58.3 y) with a history of subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer underwent (18)F-FDG PET for various clinical indications. After whole-body imaging, the patients were asked to drink water, and then spot imaging of the stomach was performed. (18)F-FDG uptake in the remnant stomach was considered positive for malignancy if it was persistently increased, whether focal or diffuse, after water ingestion. We used 2 standardized uptake value (SUV) criteria to differentiate benign from malignant uptake. First, a lesion was considered benign if its SUV was less than 2 on whole-body imaging. Second, for a lesion with an SUV of 2 or above, it was classified as benign if SUV decreased by more than 10% after water ingestion. RESULTS: Visual analysis of whole-body images produced 9 true-negative, 4 false-positive, 16 true-positive, and 1 false-negative results. Use of additional spot images produced 12 true-negative, 1 false-positive, 15 true-positive, and 2 false-negative results. When an SUV cutoff of 2 was applied for malignancy before water ingestion, all 17 patients with local recurrence were correctly identified, but 11 of the 13 patients without local recurrence were falsely considered to have a recurrent tumor in the remnant stomach. To reduce the false-positive results, we used the second SUV criterion after water ingestion. Use of that criterion produced 4 false-negative results although it correctly identified the 11 false-positive results as true negative. CONCLUSION: Gastric distension by having patients drink a glass of water seems to be a simple, cost-effective way of improving the diagnostic accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET in patients with suspected recurrence in the remnant stomach. Visual analysis with special attention to the configuration of (18)F-FDG activity after water ingestion seems to be more useful than the change in SUV in evaluating the remnant stomach.
UNLABELLED: Physiologic (18)F-FDG uptake in the stomach can often cause false-positive results and lowers the usefulness of (18)F-FDG PET in evaluating the remnant stomach. We assessed the role of gastric distension to see whether it is beneficial for the differentiation of recurrent tumors from physiologic (18)F-FDG uptake in the remnant stomach. METHODS: Thirty patients (22 men and 8 women; age range, 27-80 y; mean age, 58.3 y) with a history of subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer underwent (18)F-FDG PET for various clinical indications. After whole-body imaging, the patients were asked to drink water, and then spot imaging of the stomach was performed. (18)F-FDG uptake in the remnant stomach was considered positive for malignancy if it was persistently increased, whether focal or diffuse, after water ingestion. We used 2 standardized uptake value (SUV) criteria to differentiate benign from malignant uptake. First, a lesion was considered benign if its SUV was less than 2 on whole-body imaging. Second, for a lesion with an SUV of 2 or above, it was classified as benign if SUV decreased by more than 10% after water ingestion. RESULTS: Visual analysis of whole-body images produced 9 true-negative, 4 false-positive, 16 true-positive, and 1 false-negative results. Use of additional spot images produced 12 true-negative, 1 false-positive, 15 true-positive, and 2 false-negative results. When an SUV cutoff of 2 was applied for malignancy before water ingestion, all 17 patients with local recurrence were correctly identified, but 11 of the 13 patients without local recurrence were falsely considered to have a recurrent tumor in the remnant stomach. To reduce the false-positive results, we used the second SUV criterion after water ingestion. Use of that criterion produced 4 false-negative results although it correctly identified the 11 false-positive results as true negative. CONCLUSION: Gastric distension by having patients drink a glass of water seems to be a simple, cost-effective way of improving the diagnostic accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET in patients with suspected recurrence in the remnant stomach. Visual analysis with special attention to the configuration of (18)F-FDG activity after water ingestion seems to be more useful than the change in SUV in evaluating the remnant stomach.
Authors: Won Young Cho; Joo Young Cho; Il Kwun Chung; Jin Il Kim; Jin Seok Jang; Jae Hak Kim Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2011-06-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Pierre-Yves Le Roux; Cuong P Duong; Carlos S Cabalag; Bimal K Parameswaran; Jason Callahan; Rodney J Hicks Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-10-21 Impact factor: 9.236