OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the usefulness of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) measurements to differentiate constrictive pericarditis (CP) from restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCMP). BACKGROUND: The differentiation of CP from RCMP may be clinically difficult and often requires hemodynamic assessment. No laboratory marker has been shown to differentiate the two conditions. METHODS: We measured BNP levels in 11 patients suspected of having either CP or RCMP. All patients had hemodynamic assessment the day of BNP measurements. RESULTS: Six patients had CP and five patients had RCMP based on established hemodynamic criteria. Both CP and RCMP patients had similar elevation in intracardiac pressures. Despite similar pressures, the mean plasma BNP levels were significantly higher in RCMP compared to CP (825.8 +/- 172.2 pg/ml vs. 128.0 +/- 52.7 pg/ml, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The BNP levels are significantly elevated in RCMP compared to CP patients; BNP may prove to be a useful noninvasive marker for the differentiation of the two conditions.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the usefulness of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) measurements to differentiate constrictive pericarditis (CP) from restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCMP). BACKGROUND: The differentiation of CP from RCMP may be clinically difficult and often requires hemodynamic assessment. No laboratory marker has been shown to differentiate the two conditions. METHODS: We measured BNP levels in 11 patients suspected of having either CP or RCMP. All patients had hemodynamic assessment the day of BNP measurements. RESULTS: Six patients had CP and five patients had RCMP based on established hemodynamic criteria. Both CP and RCMP patients had similar elevation in intracardiac pressures. Despite similar pressures, the mean plasma BNP levels were significantly higher in RCMP compared to CP (825.8 +/- 172.2 pg/ml vs. 128.0 +/- 52.7 pg/ml, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The BNP levels are significantly elevated in RCMP compared to CP patients; BNP may prove to be a useful noninvasive marker for the differentiation of the two conditions.
Authors: Brandon Erickson; Gurpreet Dhaliwal; Mark C Henderson; Ezra Amsterdam; Joseph Rencic Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-07-15 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Neeraj Parakh; Sameer Mehrotra; Sandeep Seth; S Ramakrishnan; Shyam S Kothari; Balram Bhargava; V K Bahl Journal: Indian Heart J Date: 2015-03-13