Literature DB >> 15936568

Relative biologic effectiveness determination in mouse intestine for scanning proton beam at Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland. Influence of motion.

John Gueulette1, Hans Blattmann, Eros Pedroni, A Coray, Blanche M De Coster, Pierre Mahy, André Wambersie, Gudrun Goitein.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the relative biologic effectiveness (RBE) of the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI) scanning proton beam in reference conditions and to evaluate the influence of intestine motion on the proton dose homogeneity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: First, RBE was determined for crypt regeneration in mice after irradiation in a single fraction. Irradiation was performed at the middle of a 7-cm spread out Bragg peak (SOBP; reference position), as well as in the proximal part of the plateau and at the distal end of the SOBP. Control gamma-irradiation was randomized with proton irradiation and performed simultaneously. Second, motion of mouse intestine was determined by radiographs after copper wire markers had been placed on the jejunum and intestinal wall.
RESULTS: Proton RBE (reference (60)Co gamma) was equal to 1.16 for irradiation at the middle of the SOBP and to 1.11 and 1.21 for irradiation in the initial plateau and end of the SOBP, respectively. The confidence intervals for these RBE values were much larger than those obtained in the other proton beams we have tested so far. They exceeded +/-0.20 (compared with the usual value of +/-0.07), which resulted from the unusually large dispersion of the individual proton data. The instantaneous positions of the mice intestines varied by +/-2 mm in the course of irradiation.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study have shown that the RBE of the PSI proton beam is in total accordance with the RBE obtained at the other centers. This experiment has corroborated that proton RBE at the middle of the SOBP is slightly larger than the generic value of 1.10 and that there is a slight tendency for the RBE to increase close to the end of the SOBP. Also, excessive dispersion of individual proton data may be considered to result from intestine motion, taking into account that irradiation at the PSI is delivered dynamically by scanning the target volume with a pencil proton beam ("spot scanning"). Because 2-mm movements resulted in significant variations in local dose depositions, this should be considered for moving targets. Strategies to reduce this effect for the spot scanning technique have been developed at the PSI for radiotherapy of humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15936568     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.03.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  6 in total

1.  Small bowel toxicity after high dose spot scanning-based proton beam therapy for paraspinal/retroperitoneal neoplasms.

Authors:  R A Schneider; V Vitolo; F Albertini; T Koch; C Ares; A Lomax; G Goitein; E B Hug
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Proton therapy radiation pneumonitis local dose-response in esophagus cancer patients.

Authors:  Alfredo E Echeverria; Matthew McCurdy; Richard Castillo; Vincent Bernard; Natalia Velez Ramos; William Buckley; Edward Castillo; Ping Liu; Josue Martinez; Thomas Guerrero
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Pencil beam scanning dosimetry for large animal irradiation.

Authors:  Liyong Lin; Timothy D Solberg; Alexandro Carabe; James E Mcdonough; Eric Diffenderfer; Jenine K Sanzari; Ann R Kennedy; Keith Cengel
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 2.724

4.  Evaluation of proton beam radiation-induced skin injury in a murine model using a clinical SOBP.

Authors:  Pietro Pisciotta; Angelita Costantino; Francesco Paolo Cammarata; Filippo Torrisi; Giovanna Calabrese; Valentina Marchese; Giuseppe Antonio Pablo Cirrone; Giada Petringa; Giusi Irma Forte; Luigi Minafra; Valentina Bravatà; Massimo Gulisano; Fabrizio Scopelliti; Francesco Tommasino; Emanuele Scifoni; Giacomo Cuttone; Massimo Ippolito; Rosalba Parenti; Giorgio Russo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Enhanced radiobiological effects at the distal end of a clinical proton beam: in vitro study.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Matsumoto; Taeko Matsuura; Mami Wada; Yusuke Egashira; Teiji Nishio; Yoshiya Furusawa
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 2.724

6.  Evaluation of the relative biological effectiveness of spot-scanning proton irradiation in vitro.

Authors:  Kenichiro Maeda; Hironobu Yasui; Taeko Matsuura; Tohru Yamamori; Motofumi Suzuki; Masaki Nagane; Jin-Min Nam; Osamu Inanami; Hiroki Shirato
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 2.724

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.