BACKGROUND: Systemic metastasis of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) in the form of bulk tumor is rare. This could be because of patient death before clinically detectable systemic metastasis, impediments to systemic egress, or the inability of GBM to grow outside the central nervous system (CNS). In the present paper, we tested this last hypothesis. METHODS: The delayed brain tumor (DBT) cell was characterized with respect to in vitro and in vivo morphology, growth rate, anchorage-independent growth, glial fibrillary acidic protein expression and cytogenetic analysis, and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) typing. We then assayed implantation-induced intracerebral and systemic GBM growth using 3 rodent models with increasing relative immunologic differences between implanted DBT cells and hosts (Balb/c mice, an isograft, MHC I H2, class type D; C3H mice, an allograft; Wistar rats, a xenograft). RESULTS: After implantation in the brain, DBT cells generated tumors that were similar to human GBM. Intracerebral DBT implantation as an isograft or allograft produced only intracranial tumors, whereas intracerebral and systemic implantation as a xenograft produced no tumors. Systemic isograft implantation yielded only systemic tumors. Systemic implantation as allografts produced only transient subcutaneous masses. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed brain tumor cells implanted outside the CNS formed tumors unless there was a significant difference between the immunotype of the implanted cells and host. These results support the hypothesis that the rarity of systemic GBM tumors lies in the presence of physical barriers and/or systemic hurdles that prevent their timely growth. These results also demonstrate that GBMs are antigenic, although not immunogenic, with their syngeneic host. Therefore, GBM may be amenable to targeted immunotherapy given successful artificial priming of the immune system.
BACKGROUND: Systemic metastasis of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) in the form of bulk tumor is rare. This could be because of patient death before clinically detectable systemic metastasis, impediments to systemic egress, or the inability of GBM to grow outside the central nervous system (CNS). In the present paper, we tested this last hypothesis. METHODS: The delayed brain tumor (DBT) cell was characterized with respect to in vitro and in vivo morphology, growth rate, anchorage-independent growth, glial fibrillary acidic protein expression and cytogenetic analysis, and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) typing. We then assayed implantation-induced intracerebral and systemic GBM growth using 3 rodent models with increasing relative immunologic differences between implanted DBT cells and hosts (Balb/c mice, an isograft, MHC I H2, class type D; C3H mice, an allograft; Wistar rats, a xenograft). RESULTS: After implantation in the brain, DBT cells generated tumors that were similar to human GBM. Intracerebral DBT implantation as an isograft or allograft produced only intracranial tumors, whereas intracerebral and systemic implantation as a xenograft produced no tumors. Systemic isograft implantation yielded only systemic tumors. Systemic implantation as allografts produced only transient subcutaneous masses. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed brain tumor cells implanted outside the CNS formed tumors unless there was a significant difference between the immunotype of the implanted cells and host. These results support the hypothesis that the rarity of systemic GBM tumors lies in the presence of physical barriers and/or systemic hurdles that prevent their timely growth. These results also demonstrate that GBMs are antigenic, although not immunogenic, with their syngeneic host. Therefore, GBM may be amenable to targeted immunotherapy given successful artificial priming of the immune system.
Authors: Kiran Kumar Solingapuram Sai; Chaofeng Huang; Liya Yuan; Dong Zhou; David Piwnica-Worms; Joel R Garbow; John A Engelbach; Robert H Mach; Keith M Rich; Jonathan McConathy Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2013-05-06 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Abhishek Ray; Sunil Manjila; Alia M Hdeib; Archana Radhakrishnan; Charles J Nock; Mark L Cohen; Andrew E Sloan Journal: Mol Clin Oncol Date: 2015-01-23
Authors: A K M Ghulam Muhammad; Marianela Candolfi; Gwendalyn D King; Kader Yagiz; David Foulad; Yohei Mineharu; Kurt M Kroeger; Katherine A Treuer; W Stephen Nichols; Nicholas S Sanderson; Jieping Yang; Maksim Khayznikov; Nico Van Rooijen; Pedro R Lowenstein; Maria G Castro Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-09-29 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Michael W Graner; Oscar Alzate; Angelika M Dechkovskaia; Jack D Keene; John H Sampson; Duane A Mitchell; Darell D Bigner Journal: FASEB J Date: 2008-12-24 Impact factor: 5.191