Literature DB >> 15936188

Vascular effects of aromatase inhibitors: data from clinical trials.

Anthony Howell1, Jack Cuzick.   

Abstract

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are becoming the endocrine treatment of first choice for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and are under investigation for use in breast cancer prevention. AIs reduce circulating estrogen to barely detectable concentrations. It is possible that such a low concentration will be deleterious to the vascular system since estrogen receptors are known to be in the cell walls of blood vessels and estrogen is thought to be important in maintaining blood vessel integrity. Because most women who present with primary breast cancer are cured by surgery and systemic therapy and the major cause of female death is vascular disease, it is particularly important to investigate the vascular side effects of AIs in current breast cancer adjuvant and prevention trials. In order to set the vascular toxicities of AIs reported in the current adjuvant trials into context, here we compare them with the toxicities seen during treatment with hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs). Clinical trial evidence indicates that HRT increases risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) whereas SERMs and AIs (to date) appear to be neutral. Cerebrovascular disease and venous thromboembotic events are increased by HRT and SERMs but appear to be unaffected by treatment with AIs. Cognitive function is also considered here since it may also have a vascular component and is potentially a serious potential side effect/benefit of AIs. Recent studies indicate that HRT has a small detrimental effect on cognitive function and is associated with a doubling of the incidence of dementia. A comprehensive study of the SERM, raloxifene, on cognitive function showed no significant effect. There are no definitive reported studies investigating tamoxifen and none for AIs on cognitive function, although there is one in progress in the context of the IBIS II prevention trial which compares anastrozole to placebo in women at high risk. At present concerns about deleterious vascular side effects are confined to HRT and SERMs. However, we have few long-term data using AIs for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15936188     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2005.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol        ISSN: 0960-0760            Impact factor:   4.292


  4 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular health and aromatase inhibitors.

Authors:  Kathleen I Pritchard; Beth L Abramson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Association of adjuvant aromatase inhibitor with cataract risk in postmenopausal women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Han Chen; Zhi-Ming Shao; Ke-Da Yu; Ge-Zhi Xu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-03

Review 3.  The what, why and how of aromatase inhibitors: hormonal agents for treatment and prevention of breast cancer.

Authors:  C J Fabian
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Safety of adjuvant endocrine therapies in hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer.

Authors:  S Sehdev; G Martin; L Sideris; W Lam; S Brisson
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.677

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.