| Literature DB >> 15935476 |
Wynne S Korr1, John A Encandela, Donald Brieland.
Abstract
At times in psychiatric treatment practice in the United States, the notion of individualism or independence (an American ideal) is confused with autonomy (a rights goal). Client autonomy is defined as the ability of clients to make their own choices. When the societal ideal of independence overrides individual autonomy, inclusion and client well-being may be jeopardized. A case will be presented to illustrate these points. We make recommendations for professional education to protect client rights through understanding the distinction between autonomy and independence.Entities:
Keywords: Mental Health Therapies; Professional Patient Relationship
Mesh:
Year: 2005 PMID: 15935476 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2003.10.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Law Psychiatry ISSN: 0160-2527