Literature DB >> 15935270

Clinical performance and marginal adaptation of class II direct and semidirect composite restorations over 3.5 years in vivo.

Roberto C Spreafico1, Ivo Krejci, Didier Dietschi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study evaluated the clinical performance and marginal adaptation of direct and semi-direct class II composite restorations in a split-mouth design over 3.5 years.
DESIGN: 44 upper posterior teeth in 11 adults with primary carious lesions were treated with 22 direct and 22 semi-direct restorations. Conventional cavities were prepared for both types of restorations. A fine fine hybrid composite (APH) and a multifunctional adhesive system (Prisma universal bond 3) were used for all restorations. The incremental "3-sited light curing" technique was applied to direct restorations. Semi-direct inlays were prefabricated on silicone casts and post-cured using light and heat. Clinical performance was evaluated using modified USPHS parameters, while marginal adaptation was judged on replicas, using SEM and a standardized evaluation technique.
RESULTS: Clinical results after 3.5 years revealed a 100% retention rate with no fractures, sensitivity or recurrent caries for both types of restorations. SEM-evaluation of the occlusal margins showed at the tooth-restoration interface relatively low rates of marginal openings over the observation period (4-8%). Marginal restoration fractures ranged between 1 and 2%, marginal tooth fractures between 3 and 9%. Differences between the restorative techniques and after the different time observation periods were not statistically significant. Proportions of marginal fractures and openings at the restoration-luting composite interface were less than 10% after 3.5 years.
CONCLUSION: The results indicated no significant differences for direct and semi-direct fine hybrid composite restorations in medium size cavities in posterior teeth with respect to clinical performance and marginal adaptation over 3.5 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15935270     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  10 in total

1.  3D finite element analysis on esthetic indirect dental restorations under thermal and mechanical loading.

Authors:  Tulimar P M Cornacchia; Estevam B Las Casas; Carlos Alberto Cimini; Rodrigo G Peixoto
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Silorane, ormocer, methacrylate and compomer long-term staining susceptibility using ΔE and ΔE 00 colour-difference formulas.

Authors:  Ladislav Gregor; Ivo Krejci; Enrico Di Bella; Albert J Feilzer; Stefano Ardu
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  Polymerization shrinkage and spherical glass mega fillers: effects on cuspal deflection.

Authors:  M Andreasi Bassi; S Serra; C Andrisani; S Lico; L Baggi; D Lauritano
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-02-14

4.  A randomized clinical trial of class II composite restorations using direct and semidirect techniques.

Authors:  Carlos Rocha Gomes Torres; Mariane Cintra Mailart; Érica Crastechini; Fernanda Alves Feitosa; Stella Renato Machado Esteves; Rebeca Di Nicoló; Alessandra Bühler Borges
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Color stability of recent composite resins.

Authors:  S Ardu; O Duc; E Di Bella; I Krejci
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 2.634

6.  Color stability of different composite resins after polishing.

Authors:  Stefano Ardu; O Duc; E Di Bella; I Krejci; René Daher
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 2.634

7.  Comparative clinical evaluation of a self-adhering flowable composite with conventional flowable composite in Class I cavity: An in vivo study.

Authors:  Ashwini V Kalola; S U Sreejith; Shikha Kanodia; Abhishek Parmar; Jaiprathiksha V Iyer; Girish J Parmar
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2022-05-04

8.  Indirect composite restorations luted with two different procedures: A ten years follow up clinical trial.

Authors:  Nicola Barabanti; Alessandro Preti; Michele Vano; Giacomo Derchi; Francesco Mangani; Antonio Cerutti
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2015-02-01

9.  The evaluation of various restoration techniques on internal adaptation of composites in class v cavities.

Authors:  D Dionysopoulos; C Papadopoulos; E Koliniotou-Koumpia
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2014-10-02

10.  One-year results of a novel self-adhesive bulk-fill restorative and a conventional bulk-fill composite in class II cavities-a randomized clinical split-mouth study.

Authors:  Fabian Cieplik; Konstantin J Scholz; Julian C Anthony; Isabelle Tabenski; Sarah Ettenberger; Karl-Anton Hiller; Wolfgang Buchalla; Marianne Federlin
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.606

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.