Literature DB >> 15934817

Adoption of array technologies into the clinical laboratory.

Andrew G Hadd1, Justin T Brown, Bernard F Andruss, Fei Ye, Cindy R WalkerPeach.   

Abstract

Array-based methods are making substantial contributions to the discovery of disease biomarkers and are fueling the growth of multianalyte testing for disease diagnosis and treatment. The distillation of high-density array results into sets of signature markers promises to improve disease staging, risk stratification and treatment decisions. To accommodate the growing requirement for multiplex testing, clinical laboratories are converting several single-analyte tests into array-based formats. However, adoption of array technologies provides several challenges to the laboratory, which must evaluate these new formats, train laboratory personnel, market the new services and obtain reimbursement for new analytes. Liquid-bead arrays are an attractive format for routine clinical diagnostics due to a combination of appropriate analyte density, simultaneous array decoding and detection, and flexibility for rapid customization. In this review, the suitability of several array platforms to diagnostic testing and applications of liquid-bead arrays for cystic fibrosis testing, multidisease carrier status assays and leukemia subtyping are discussed. As our understanding of the clinical utility of new or established biomarkers and recommendations for testing change, flexibility and adaptability of array platforms will be imperative. Future development of novel assay formats and improved quantitation will expand the number of diseases tested and lead to further integration into the diagnostic laboratory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15934817     DOI: 10.1586/14737159.5.3.409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1473-7159            Impact factor:   5.225


  6 in total

1.  A protein multiplex microarray substrate with high sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  Dolores A Fici; William McCormick; David W Brown; John E Herrmann; Vikram Kumar; Zuheir L Awdeh
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  A comparative study of five technologically diverse CFTR testing platforms.

Authors:  Monique A Johnson; Marvin J Yoshitomi; C Sue Richards
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  Fabrication of uniform DNA-conjugated hydrogel microparticles via replica molding for facile nucleic acid hybridization assays.

Authors:  Christina L Lewis; Chang-Hyung Choi; Yan Lin; Chang-Soo Lee; Hyunmin Yi
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Impact of compounding error on strategies for subtyping pathogenic bacteria.

Authors:  Douglas R Call; Lisa Orfe; Margaret A Davis; Stacey Lafrentz; Min-Su Kang
Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.171

5.  Competitive reporter monitored amplification (CMA)--quantification of molecular targets by real time monitoring of competitive reporter hybridization.

Authors:  Thomas Ullrich; Eugen Ermantraut; Torsten Schulz; Katrin Steinmetzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Polymorphisms in the glucocerebrosidase gene and pseudogene urge caution in clinical analysis of Gaucher disease allele c.1448T>C (L444P).

Authors:  Justin T Brown; Cora Lahey; Walairat Laosinchai-Wolf; Andrew G Hadd
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 2.103

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.