Edward H Yelin1, Laura S Trupin, Patricia P Katz. 1. Rosalind Russell Medical Research Center for Arthritis, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0920, USA. yelin2@itsa.ucsf.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the use of biologic agents among persons with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in managed care and fee-for-service settings. METHODS: The present study uses data from the University of California, San Francisco RA Panel Study in which 529 patients with RA from a random sample of northern California rheumatologists were interviewed annually between 1999 and 2002 using a structured survey instrument. Linear and logistic regression were used to compare current utilization, initiation, and cessation of biologic agents and other treatments among patients with RA in managed care and fee-for-service settings, with and without adjustment for differences in demographic and health characteristics. RESULTS: After adjustment, patients with RA in health maintenance organizations (HMOs) were significantly less likely to use biologic agents than those in other managed care settings (difference of -6.6%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] -11.4%, -1.7%) or than those in fee-for-service settings (difference of -12.5%; 95% CI -19.0%, -5.9%); patients in other managed care settings and fee-for-service did not differ significantly in their use of biologic agents. Patients with RA in HMOs were significantly less likely than those in other managed care settings to initiate the use of biologic agents (difference of -7.3%; 95% CI -11.5%, -3.1%); there were no other differences between patients in HMOs and those in other managed care and fee-for-service settings in rates of initiation or cessation of these agents. Patients with RA in HMOs were less likely to use methotrexate, cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) inhibitors, and corticosteroids than those in other managed care settings; they were also less likely to use COX-2 inhibitors than those in fee-for-service settings. CONCLUSION: Patients with RA in HMOs were significantly less likely to use biologic agents than those in other managed care and fee-for-service settings, primarily due to lower rates of initiation.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare the use of biologic agents among persons with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in managed care and fee-for-service settings. METHODS: The present study uses data from the University of California, San Francisco RA Panel Study in which 529 patients with RA from a random sample of northern California rheumatologists were interviewed annually between 1999 and 2002 using a structured survey instrument. Linear and logistic regression were used to compare current utilization, initiation, and cessation of biologic agents and other treatments among patients with RA in managed care and fee-for-service settings, with and without adjustment for differences in demographic and health characteristics. RESULTS: After adjustment, patients with RA in health maintenance organizations (HMOs) were significantly less likely to use biologic agents than those in other managed care settings (difference of -6.6%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] -11.4%, -1.7%) or than those in fee-for-service settings (difference of -12.5%; 95% CI -19.0%, -5.9%); patients in other managed care settings and fee-for-service did not differ significantly in their use of biologic agents. Patients with RA in HMOs were significantly less likely than those in other managed care settings to initiate the use of biologic agents (difference of -7.3%; 95% CI -11.5%, -3.1%); there were no other differences between patients in HMOs and those in other managed care and fee-for-service settings in rates of initiation or cessation of these agents. Patients with RA in HMOs were less likely to use methotrexate, cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) inhibitors, and corticosteroids than those in other managed care settings; they were also less likely to use COX-2 inhibitors than those in fee-for-service settings. CONCLUSION:Patients with RA in HMOs were significantly less likely to use biologic agents than those in other managed care and fee-for-service settings, primarily due to lower rates of initiation.
Authors: D E Furst; F C Breedveld; J R Kalden; J S Smolen; G R Burmester; J W J Bijlsma; M Dougados; P Emery; E C Keystone; L Klareskog; P J Mease Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Jeffrey D Greenberg; Mitsumasa Kishimoto; Vibeke Strand; Stanley B Cohen; Thomas P Olenginski; Thomas Harrington; Shelly P Kafka; George Reed; Joel M Kremer Journal: Am J Med Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 4.965