Literature DB >> 15933798

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a prospective evaluation of functional results.

Peter A Cataldo1, Sean O'Brien, Turner Osler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Local excision is a commonly used technique for many benign and selected malignant rectal lesions. Compared with radical resection, it is associated with decreased morbidity and mortality and improved functional results. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is gaining popularity because of its ability to access the upper rectum and its precise excision techniques. However, the functional consequences have not been extensively studied.
METHODS: All patients subject to transanal endoscopic microsurgery prospectively completed preoperative and postoperative (6 weeks) surveys including Fecal Incontinence Severity Index, Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life, number of bowel movements per 24 hours, and ability to defer defecation. All data were collected by an independent research coordinator. Demographics, operative details, and complications were also collected prospectively.
RESULTS: Forty-one patients successfully underwent transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Fourteen patients had malignant lesions and 27 had benign lesions. Two patients required abdominoperineal resection based on postoperative diagnosis. Thirty-nine patients have completed follow-up and were available for review. Mean length of surgery was 64 minutes and length of stay was 0.9 day. Average distance from the anal verge to the proximal tumor margin was 11.4 cm and mean tumor size was 8.75 cm. Twenty-three patients had full-thickness excision with primary closure, ten had full-thickness excision without closure, five had partial-thickness excision, one had an excision of a mass in the anovaginal septum, and one had resection of an anastomotic stricture. Each patient served as his own control. Preoperative and postoperative number of bowel movements per 24 hours were 2.0 and 2.0, respectively. Preoperative vs. postoperative urgency (ability to defer defecation less than ten minutes) was unchanged. Mean preoperative and postoperative Fecal Incontinence Severity Index scores were 2.4 (range, 0-43) and 2.4 (range, 0-17), respectively (higher scores indicate worse function). In addition, the four parameters measured by the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life survey were unchanged when preoperative and postoperative data were compared.
CONCLUSIONS: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery allows precise excision of tumors throughout the rectum. However, it involves inserting a 40-mm-diameter operating proctoscope and significant operating times. Despite this, as measured by ability to defer defecation, number of bowel movements per 24 hours, Fecal Incontinence Severity Index, and Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life survey, transanal endoscopic microsurgery has no detrimental affect on fecal continence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15933798     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-005-0031-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  37 in total

Review 1.  Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery.

Authors:  Theodore John Saclarides
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-09

2.  Quality of life and fecal incontinence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for benign and malignant rectal lesions.

Authors:  Elsa B Valsdottir; Shadi S Yarandi; John H Marks; Gerald J Marks
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Functional and clinical results of transanal endoscopic microsurgery combined with endoscopic posterior mesorectum resection for the treatment of patients with t1 rectal cancer.

Authors:  Piotr Walega; Jakub Kenig; Piotr Richter; Wojciech Nowak
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Quality of life in non-early rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy and endoluminal loco-regional resection (ELRR) by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Giancarlo D'Ambrosio; Alessandro M Paganini; Andrea Balla; Silvia Quaresima; Pietro Ursi; Paolo Bruzzone; Andrea Picchetto; Fabrizio I Mattei; Emanuele Lezoche
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  New trends in colorectal surgery: single port and natural orifice techniques.

Authors:  Ronald Daher; Elie Chouillard; Yves Panis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Transanal total mesorectal excision: a pure NOTES approach for selected patients.

Authors:  P Leão; A Goulart; C Veiga; H Cristino; N Marcos; J Correia-Pinto; M Rodrigues; C Moreno-Sanz
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 7.  Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Authors:  Earl V Thompson; Joshua I S Bleier
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-04

Review 8.  Transanal Approach to Rectal Polyps and Cancer.

Authors:  Vinay Rai; Nitin Mishra
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-03

Review 9.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus local excision for early rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Wang; S Gao; W Yang; S Guo; Y Li
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEMS) for Rectal Cancer: Patient Decision-making, Postoperative Experience and Quality of Life.

Authors:  Alexandra Koreli; George Briassoulis; Michail Sideris; Anastas Philalithis; Savvas Papagrigoriadis
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.