Literature DB >> 15933493

Reliability of the FCR H-reflex.

Anita D Christie1, J Greig Inglis, Jean P Boucher, David A Gabriel.   

Abstract

This study examined the intraclass reliability of the latency and amplitude of the Hoffmann reflex (H-reflex) in the flexor carpi radialis (FCR). The stability and consistency of the latency and peak-to-peak amplitude of the H-reflex were assessed across four test sessions. The FCR H-reflex was evoked in 39 volunteers (20 males and 19 females) on four separate days. The maximum amplitude of the motor response (Mmax) was determined each day and 10 responses were recorded at that stimulus intensity. The H-reflex was then evoked at an intensity corresponding to 5% of Mmax (H5%) and 10 recordings were obtained. The latency of the H-reflex and the peak-to-peak amplitude of both Mmax and H5% were calculated for each trial. Determination of reliability involves the consideration of both the stability and consistency of the measures. The reliability of the measures in this investigation was assessed using an analysis of variance and corresponding Lindquist intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) model. In contrast to previous investigations, the H-reflex was evoked without facilitation in 95% (37/39) of the subjects tested. Statistical evaluation revealed that the latency and amplitude of the H-reflex, as well as the amplitude of Mmax, were both stable and consistent across the four test days. The ICC for Mmax was 0.97. The ICC for H5% was 0.92, and for latency of the H-reflex was 0.89. It was shown that the H-reflex can be easily evoked in the FCR and that the latency and amplitude of these recordings are highly reliable. The demonstration that the H-reflex can be easily and consistently evoked in the FCR has important clinical implications. It provides a tool for clinicians to assess the C7 level of the spinal cord and median nerve function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15933493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0736-0258            Impact factor:   2.177


  10 in total

1.  The stability of M(max) and H (max) amplitude over time.

Authors:  Penelope A McNulty; Christine T Shiner; Ganesha K Thayaparan; David Burke
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Spinal and cortical activity-dependent plasticity following learning of complex arm movements in humans.

Authors:  T Winkler; B Mergner; J Szecsi; A Bender; A Straube
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Retraining Reflexes: Clinical Translation of Spinal Reflex Operant Conditioning.

Authors:  Amir Eftekhar; James J S Norton; Christine M McDonough; Jonathan R Wolpaw
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  Comparing the validity of the Modified Modified Ashworth Scale (MMAS) and the Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) in the assessment of wrist flexor spasticity in patients with stroke: protocol for a neurophysiological study.

Authors:  Hamid Abolhasani; Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari; Soofia Naghdi; Korosh Mansouri; Nastaran Ghotbi; Scott Hasson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Reliability of the biceps brachii M-wave.

Authors:  Kristina M Calder; Lesley-Ann Hall; Steve M Lester; J Greig Inglis; David A Gabriel
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  The effects of cervical transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation on motor pathways supplying the upper limb in humans.

Authors:  Siobhan C Dongés; Jessica M D'Amico; Jane E Butler; Janet L Taylor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Neural, biomechanical, and physiological factors involved in sex-related differences in the maximal rate of isometric torque development.

Authors:  J Greig Inglis; Kyle McIntosh; David A Gabriel
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Peripheral Nerve Magnetoneurography With Optically Pumped Magnetometers.

Authors:  Yifeng Bu; Jacob Prince; Hamed Mojtahed; Donald Kimball; Vishal Shah; Todd Coleman; Mahasweta Sarkar; Ramesh Rao; Mingxiong Huang; Peter Schwindt; Amir Borna; Imanuel Lerman
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Teaching Essential EMG Theory to Kinesiologists and Physical Therapists Using Analogies Visual Descriptions, and Qualitative Analysis of Biophysical Concepts.

Authors:  David A Gabriel
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.847

10.  Repeatability of corticospinal and spinal measures during lengthening and shortening contractions in the human tibialis anterior muscle.

Authors:  Jamie Tallent; Stuart Goodall; Tibor Hortobágyi; Alan St Clair Gibson; Duncan N French; Glyn Howatson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.