Literature DB >> 15933485

Venlafaxine XR demonstrates higher rates of sustained remission compared to fluoxetine, paroxetine or placebo.

Charles Shelton1, Richard Entsuah, S Krishna Padmanabhan, Phillip E Vinall.   

Abstract

The combined serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, venlafaxine XR, has demonstrated significant response and remission in patients diagnosed with depression when measured with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). This pooled analysis of data from five studies compared the sustained remission of depressive symptoms in patients treated with venlafaxine XR, the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) fluoxetine or paroxetine, or placebo. Data from 1391 subjects enrolled in five active and placebo-controlled studies who met the DSM-III-R or DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder were analysed. Three treatment groups were compared: venlafaxine XR (n = 560), fluoxetine/paroxetine (n = 298) and placebo (n = 496). Mean treatment duration was 8 weeks. Responders were defined as those patients whose HAM-D-21 score decreased by > or = 50% from baseline. Remission was defined as a HAM-D-17 score < or = 7. Sustained remission was defined as maintenance of remission through week 8 or the end of treatment (if before week 8) and for > or = 2 weeks. Between-group rate comparisons in outcome measures were carried out using Fisher's exact and log-rank tests. Venlafaxine XR produced significantly higher rates of sustained remission in depressed patients compared to fluoxetine/paroxetine or placebo over this 8-week treatment period. As early as week 2, a significantly greater proportion of patients treated with venlafaxine achieved improved depression scores (remission and response). A significantly greater rate of remission and sustained remission occurred with venlafaxine compared to placebo. Remission was achieved earlier with venlafaxine and lasted throughout the remainder of the study. These results demonstrate that venlafaxine XR is more effective than fluoxetine/paroxetine for sustaining remission of depressive symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15933485     DOI: 10.1097/00004850-200507000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0268-1315            Impact factor:   1.659


  4 in total

1.  Re-evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine vs SSRI: meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Weinmann; T Becker; M Koesters
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Medication complexity and affordability in use of time release antidepressants.

Authors:  Song H Hong; Yazed Al-Ruthia; Sunghee Tak
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 4.689

3.  Assessing the efficacy of 2 years of maintenance treatment with venlafaxine extended release 75-225 mg/day in patients with recurrent major depression: a secondary analysis of data from the PREVENT study.

Authors:  Susan G Kornstein; James H Kocsis; Saeeduddin Ahmed; Michael Thase; Edward S Friedman; Boadie W Dunlop; Bing Yan; Ron Pedersen; Philip T Ninan; Thomas Li; Martin Keller
Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.659

4.  The effect of venlafaxine compared with other antidepressants and placebo in the treatment of major depression: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael Bauer; Puvan Tharmanathan; Hans-Peter Volz; Hans-Juergen Moeller; Nick Freemantle
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.270

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.