OBJECTIVES: To determine whether area wide traffic calming distribution reflects known inequalities in child pedestrian injury rates. To determine whether traffic calming is associated with changes in childhood pedestrian injury rates. DESIGN: Small area ecological study, longitudinal analysis of injury rates with cross sectional analysis of traffic calming and method of travel to school. SETTINGS: Two cities in the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: 4-16 year old children between 1992 and 2000. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Area wide traffic calming distribution by area deprivation status and changes in injury rate/1000. RESULTS: The most deprived fourth of city A had 4.8 times (95% CI 3.71 to 6.22) the number of traffic calming features per 1000 population compared with the most affluent fourth. Injury rates among the most deprived dropped from 9.42 to 5.07 from 1992-94 to 1998-2000 (95% CI for change 2.82 to 5.91). In city B, the traffic calming ratio of the most to least deprived fourth was 1.88 (95% CI 1.46 to 2.42); injury rates in the deprived areas dropped from 8.92 to 7.46 (95% CI for change -0.84 to 3.77). Similar proportions of 9-12 year olds walked to school in both cities. CONCLUSIONS: Area wide traffic calming is associated with absolute reductions in child pedestrian injury rates and reductions in relative inequalities in child pedestrian injury rates.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether area wide traffic calming distribution reflects known inequalities in child pedestrian injury rates. To determine whether traffic calming is associated with changes in childhood pedestrian injury rates. DESIGN: Small area ecological study, longitudinal analysis of injury rates with cross sectional analysis of traffic calming and method of travel to school. SETTINGS: Two cities in the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: 4-16 year old children between 1992 and 2000. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Area wide traffic calming distribution by area deprivation status and changes in injury rate/1000. RESULTS: The most deprived fourth of city A had 4.8 times (95% CI 3.71 to 6.22) the number of traffic calming features per 1000 population compared with the most affluent fourth. Injury rates among the most deprived dropped from 9.42 to 5.07 from 1992-94 to 1998-2000 (95% CI for change 2.82 to 5.91). In city B, the traffic calming ratio of the most to least deprived fourth was 1.88 (95% CI 1.46 to 2.42); injury rates in the deprived areas dropped from 8.92 to 7.46 (95% CI for change -0.84 to 3.77). Similar proportions of 9-12 year olds walked to school in both cities. CONCLUSIONS: Area wide traffic calming is associated with absolute reductions in child pedestrian injury rates and reductions in relative inequalities in child pedestrian injury rates.
Authors: James Damsere-Derry; Beth E Ebel; Charles N Mock; Francis Afukaar; Peter Donkor; Thomas Ojo Kalowole Journal: Traffic Inj Prev Date: 2019-04-29 Impact factor: 1.491
Authors: Ronan A Lyons; Denise Kendrick; Elizabeth M L Towner; Carol Coupland; Mike Hayes; Nicola Christie; Judith Sleney; Sarah Jones; Richard Kimberlee; Sarah E Rodgers; Samantha Turner; Mariana Brussoni; Yana Vinogradova; Tinnu Sarvotham; Steven Macey Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-04-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Linda Rothman; Alison Macpherson; Ron Buliung; Colin Macarthur; Teresa To; Kristian Larsen; Andrew Howard Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-08-12 Impact factor: 3.295