Literature DB >> 15932962

Broadband frequency dependence of respiratory impedance in rats.

Cindy Thamrin1, Peter D Sly, Zoltán Hantos.   

Abstract

Past studies in humans and other species have revealed the presence of resonances and antiresonances, i.e., minima and maxima in respiratory system impedance (Zrs), at frequencies much higher than those commonly employed in clinical applications of the forced oscillation technique (FOT). To help understand the mechanisms behind the first occurrence of antiresonance in the Zrs spectrum, the frequency response of the rat was studied by using FOT at both low and high frequencies. We measured Zrs in both Wistar and PVG/c rats using the wave tube technique, with a FOT signal ranging from 2 to 900 Hz. We then compared the high-frequency parameters, i.e., the first antiresonant frequency (far,1) and the resistive part of Zrs at that frequency [Rrs(far,1)], with parameters obtained by fitting a modified constant-phase model to low-frequency Zrs spectra. The far,1 was 570 +/- 43 (SD) Hz and 456 +/- 16 Hz in Wistar and PVG/c rats, respectively, and it did not shift with respiratory gases of different densities (air, heliox, and a mixture of SF(6)). The far,1 and Rrs(far,1) were relatively independent of methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction but changed significantly with increasing transrespiratory pressures up to 20 cmH(2)O, in the same way as airway resistance but independently of changes to tissue parameters. These results suggest that, unlike the human situation, the first antiresonance in the rat is not primarily dependent on the acoustic dimensions of the respiratory system and can be explained by interactions between compliances and inertances localized to the airways, but this most likely does not include airway wall compliance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15932962     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00383.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  3 in total

1.  Impact of ventilation frequency and parenchymal stiffness on flow and pressure distribution in a canine lung model.

Authors:  Reza Amini; David W Kaczka
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Contributions of signal analysis to the interpretation of spirometry.

Authors:  A Anogeianaki; N Negrev; G Ilonidis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 0.471

3.  Factors influencing the assessment of lung function in mice with influenza-induced lung disease.

Authors:  Alexander N Larcombe; Graeme R Zosky; Cindy Thamrin; Elizabeth M Bozanich; Zoltán Hantos; Peter D Sly
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 4.380

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.