Literature DB >> 15932088

Results from the NIST 2004 DNA Quantitation Study.

Margaret C Kline1, David L Duewer, Janette W Redman, John M Butler.   

Abstract

For optimal DNA short tandem repeat (STR) typing results, the DNA concentration ([DNA]) of the sample must be accurately determined prior to the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification step in the typing process. In early 2004, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) conducted an interlaboratory study to help assess the accuracy of DNA quantitation in forensic DNA laboratories. This study was designed with four primary purposes: (1) to examine concentration effects and to probe performance at the lower DNA concentration levels that are frequently seen in forensic casework; (2) to examine consistency with various methodologies across multiple laboratories; (3) to examine single versus multiple source samples; and (4) to study DNA stability over time and through shipping in two types of storage tubes. Eight DNA samples of [DNA] from 0.05 ng/microL to 1.5 ng/microL were distributed. A total of 287 independent data sets were returned from 80 participants. Results were reported for 19 different DNA quantitation methodologies. Approximately 65% of the data were obtained using traditional slot blot hybridization methods; 21% were obtained using newly available quantitative real-time PCR (Q-PCR) techniques. Information from this interlaboratory study is guiding development of a future NIST Standard Reference Material for Human DNA Quantitation, SRM 2372.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15932088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Forensic Sci        ISSN: 0022-1198            Impact factor:   1.832


  8 in total

1.  Characterization of mtDNA SNP typing and mixture ratio assessment with simultaneous real-time PCR quantification of both allelic states.

Authors:  Harald Niederstätter; Michael D Coble; Petra Grubwieser; Thomas J Parsons; Walther Parson
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2005-08-09       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Assessment of DNA encapsulation, a new room-temperature DNA storage method.

Authors:  Dominique Clermont; Sylvain Santoni; Safa Saker; Maite Gomard; Eliane Gardais; Chantal Bizet
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Fluorescent duplex allele-specific PCR and amplicon melting for rapid homogeneous mtDNA haplogroup H screening and sensitive mixture detection.

Authors:  Harald Niederstätter; Walther Parson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A graphical simulation model of the entire DNA process associated with the analysis of short tandem repeat loci.

Authors:  Peter Gill; James Curran; Keith Elliot
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Comparison of swab types for collection and analysis of microorganisms.

Authors:  Natalie M Wise; Sarah J Wagner; Travis J Worst; Jon E Sprague; Crystal M Oechsle
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Observational study on variability between biobanks in the estimation of DNA concentration.

Authors:  Jay Brown; Alexander N Donev; Charalampos Aslanidis; Pippa Bracegirdle; Katherine P Dixon; Manuela Foedinger; Rhian Gwilliam; Matthew Hardy; Thomas Illig; Xiayi Ke; Dagni Krinka; Camilla Lagerberg; Päivi Laiho; David H Lewis; Wendy McArdle; Simon Patton; Susan M Ring; Gerd Schmitz; Helen Stevens; Gunnel Tybring; H Erich Wichmann; William E R Ollier; Martin A Yuille
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2009-10-13

7.  Effects of formalin fixation, paraffin embedding, and time of storage on DNA preservation in brain tissue: a BrainNet Europe study.

Authors:  Isidre Ferrer; Judith Armstrong; Sabina Capellari; Piero Parchi; Thomas Arzberger; Jeanne Bell; Herbert Budka; Thomas Ströbel; Giorgio Giaccone; Giacomina Rossi; Nenad Bogdanovic; Peter Fakai; Andrea Schmitt; Peter Riederers; Safa Al-Sarraj; Rivka Ravid; Hans Kretzschmar
Journal:  Brain Pathol       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 6.508

8.  Evaluation of microbial qPCR workflows using engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  S M Da Silva; L K Vang; N D Olson; S P Lund; A S Downey; Z Kelman; M L Salit; N J Lin; J B Morrow
Journal:  Biomol Detect Quantif       Date:  2016-02-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.