Literature DB >> 15931995

A method of mercury removal from topsoil using low-thermal application.

Rafal Kucharski1, Urszula Zielonka, Aleksandra Sas-Nowosielska, J Michael Kuperberg, Adam Worsztynowicz, Jerzy Szdzuj.   

Abstract

Mercury contamination in the environment is problematic due to the unusual physical properties and well-recognized toxicity of this common metal. The bioavailability of mercury depends strongly on its chemical speciation. Anthropogenic mercury and its compounds appear in soil as "hot spots" located close to industrial facilities that used or produced mercury. The nature of the chemical production process, transportation and disposal practices often determined the chemical composition and distribution of mercury in the surrounding soils. Current ex situ soil remediation methods are expensive, produce undesirable side effects to the environment and usually involve transportation of contaminated soil. In this project, sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy, a low-cost, simple approach to removing mercury from soil was evaluated. The process uses low-temperature thermal desorption of volatile metallic mercury and its compounds, and subsequent vapor capture. The project consisted of laboratory and plot-scale experiments. The laboratory efforts evaluated theoretical calculations of mercury removal as a function of time and temperature. The plot-scale experiment was a practical application of the laboratory results. For both experiments, mercury-polluted soil was obtained from a chemical production facility located in southern Poland. In laboratory experiments, at temperature 373 K total mercury concentration decreased in soil by nearly 32%. In plot-scale experiments, at temperature 440 K, about 60-70% of total mercury was removed from the soil. At the end of the experiment, a test of soil biological activity was performed to check if the high temperature applied to the soil did not impair the soil growth properties. There was no negative effect of temperature found.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15931995     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-005-1620-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  1 in total

1.  Some local environmental effects on mercury emission and absorption at a soil surface.

Authors:  A A Gillis; D R Miller
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2000-10-09       Impact factor: 7.963

  1 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Pollution due to hazardous glass waste.

Authors:  Deepak Pant; Pooja Singh
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  In situ remediation technologies for mercury-contaminated soil.

Authors:  Feng He; Jie Gao; Eric Pierce; P J Strong; Hailong Wang; Liyuan Liang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Sustainable remediation of mercury contaminated soils by thermal desorption.

Authors:  María J Sierra; Rocio Millán; Félix A López; Francisco J Alguacil; Inmaculada Cañadas
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 4.  Describing the toxicity and sources and the remediation technologies for mercury-contaminated soil.

Authors:  Dongye Teng; Kang Mao; Waqar Ali; Guomin Xu; Guopei Huang; Nabeel Khan Niazi; Xinbin Feng; Hua Zhang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 4.036

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.