Literature DB >> 15931956

Mercury policy and science in northeastern North America: the Mercury Action Plan of the New England Governors and Eastern Canadian Premiers.

C Mark Smith1, Luke J Trip.   

Abstract

In June 1998 the New England Governors and Eastern Canadian Premiers (NEG-ECP) adopted a comprehensive regional Mercury Action Plan (MAP) with aggressive emission reduction and pollution prevention goals for the New England States, the Atlantic Provinces and Quebec. New Jersey and New York have also been active participants. The NEG-ECP MAP was motivated by, and based on, extensive data demonstrating the widespread and serious nature of mercury impacts in the region and the existence of many preventable sources of mercury pollution. The plan established a long-term goal of virtually eliminating anthropogenic mercury releases in the region with interim goals of a 50% reduction by 2003 and 75% by 2010. Policy and regulatory initiatives implemented under the NEG-ECP MAP have exceeded federal efforts addressing mercury and have resulted in substantial regional progress in reducing mercury pollution. Recent data indicates that the region has reduced mercury emissions by approximately 55% since the NEGECP MAP was adopted. The NEG-ECP MAP provides an important demonstration of what can be technologically, economically and politically accomplished and has influenced mercury reduction programs at the global scale. Scientific information played important roles in developing and implementing this plan. Key research areas where regional policy makers would benefit from additional information include improved: environmental indicators for tracking progress; mercury release inventories, especially on mercury product breakage and mobile sources; deposition sources, including in-region and out-of-region contributors; elemental mercury exposure and impact data; determinants of mercury levels in fish; ecological impacts of mercury; and data on the effectiveness of outreach efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15931956     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-004-6257-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  13 in total

1.  Mercury accumulation and accelerated progression of carotid atherosclerosis: a population-based prospective 4-year follow-up study in men in eastern Finland.

Authors:  J T Salonen; K Seppänen; T A Lakka; R Salonen; G A Kaplan
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.162

2.  Cardiac autonomic activity in methylmercury neurotoxicity: 14-year follow-up of a Faroese birth cohort.

Authors:  Philippe Grandjean; Katsuyuki Murata; Esben Budtz-Jørgensen; Pál Weihe
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  Best management practices for amalgam waste.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Okla Dent Assoc       Date:  2004

4.  Gaseous elemental mercury as an indoor air pollutant.

Authors:  A Carpi; Y F Chen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Release of mercury from broken fluorescent bulbs.

Authors:  Michael Aucott; Michael McLinden; Michael Winka
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.235

6.  Delayed brainstem auditory evoked potential latencies in 14-year-old children exposed to methylmercury.

Authors:  Katsuyuki Murata; Pál Weihe; Esben Budtz-Jørgensen; Poul J Jørgensen; Philippe Grandjean
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.406

7.  Prenatal methylmercury exposure from ocean fish consumption in the Seychelles child development study.

Authors:  Gary J Myers; Philip W Davidson; Christopher Cox; Conrad F Shamlaye; Donna Palumbo; Elsa Cernichiari; Jean Sloane-Reeves; Gregory E Wilding; James Kost; Li-Shan Huang; Thomas W Clarkson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-05-17       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Reactivity and mobility of new and old mercury deposition in a boreal forest ecosystem during the first year of the METAALICUS study. Mercury Experiment To Assess Atmospheric Loading In Canada and the US.

Authors:  Holger Hintelmann; Reed Harris; Andrew Heyes; James P Hurley; Carol A Kelly; David P Krabbenhoft; Steve Lindberg; John W M Rudd; Karen J Scott; Vincent L St Louis
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Mercury exposure in a residential community--Florida, 1994.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1995-06-16       Impact factor: 17.586

10.  Assessing elemental mercury vapor exposure from cultural and religious practices.

Authors:  D M Riley; C A Newby; T O Leal-Almeraz; V M Thomas
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Approaches to reducing mercury in North America.

Authors:  Jeri Weiss
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  MercNet: a national monitoring network to assess responses to changing mercury emissions in the United States.

Authors:  David Schmeltz; David C Evers; Charles T Driscoll; Richard Artz; Mark Cohen; David Gay; Richard Haeuber; David P Krabbenhoft; Robert Mason; Kristi Morris; James G Wiener
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Mercury policy in the Great Lakes states: past successes and future opportunities.

Authors:  Alexis Cain; Joy Taylor Morgan; Ned Brooks
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Global and Local Impacts of Delayed Mercury Mitigation Efforts.

Authors:  Hélène Angot; Nicholas Hoffman; Amanda Giang; Colin P Thackray; Ashley N Hendricks; Noel R Urban; Noelle E Selin
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 9.028

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.