Literature DB >> 15931146

Comparison of pressure ulcer treatments in long-term care facilities: clinical outcomes and impact on cost.

Siva Narayanan1, John Van Vleet, Billy Strunk, Robert N Ross, Mikel Gray.   

Abstract

This study compared clinical outcomes and nursing labor costs associated with (a) balsam Peru, hydrogenated castor oil, and trypsin (BCT) ointment; (b) BCT + Other; and (c) Other treatments in 2014 wound episodes occurring in 861 patients (mean 2.34 wounds/patient). Treatment with BCT ointment or BCT + Other was associated with a higher healing rate (P < .05). No Stage 1 or 2 ulcer treated with BCT ointment progressed, compared with 13.8% treated with BCT + Other and 13.4% treated with Other. The reported mean duration of treatment and time to heal were shorter for ulcers treated with BCT ointment, but differences did not reach significance, possibly because of the variability in reported treatment times. Mean daily nursing labor costs were lower for treatment with BCT than Other ($50.8 vs $61.7, P < .05). These data suggest that treatment of Stage 1 or 2 ulcers with BCT may be associated with shorter treatment time and time to heal and a potential reduction in treatment-related nursing labor costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15931146     DOI: 10.1097/00152192-200505000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs        ISSN: 1071-5754            Impact factor:   1.741


  7 in total

1.  The Use of a No-sting Barrier Film Treatment Protocol Compared to Routine Clinical Care for the Treatment of Stage 1 and 2 Pressure Injuries in Long-term Care.

Authors:  Adrian Chan; Henry Yu-Hin Siu
Journal:  J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec       Date:  2016-11-17

2.  Effects of nursing practice environments on quality outcomes in nursing homes.

Authors:  Linda Flynn; Yulan Liang; Geri L Dickson; Linda H Aiken
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  An economic appraisal of the Australian Medical Sheepskin for the prevention of sacral pressure ulcers from a nursing home perspective.

Authors:  Patriek Mistiaen; Andre Ament; Anneke L Francke; Wilco Achterberg; Ruud Halfens; Janneke Huizinga; Henri Post
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Management of leg and pressure ulcer in hospitalized patients: direct costs are lower than expected.

Authors:  Ojan Assadian; Joseph S Oswald; Rainer Leisten; Peter Hinz; Georg Daeschlein; Axel Kramer
Journal:  GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip       Date:  2011-12-15

Review 5.  A systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of complex wound interventions reveals optimal treatments for specific wound types.

Authors:  Andrea C Tricco; Elise Cogo; Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai; Paul A Khan; Geetha Sanmugalingham; Jesmin Antony; Jeffrey S Hoch; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 8.775

6.  Study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of a comprehensive pressure ulcer prevention programme for private for-profit nursing homes.

Authors:  Enid Wai-yung Kwong; Paul Hong Lee; Kwan-mo Yeung
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 3.921

7.  Improvement of pressure ulcer prevention care in private for-profit residential care homes: an action research study.

Authors:  Enid Wy Kwong; Maria Sy Hung; Kevin Woo
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.921

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.