Literature DB >> 1593061

Lesion morphology and coronary angioplasty: current experience and analysis.

R K Myler1, R E Shaw, S H Stertzer, H S Hecht, C Ryan, J Rosenblum, D C Cumberland, M C Murphy, H N Hansell, B Hidalgo.   

Abstract

From July 1, 1990 to February 28, 1991, 533 consecutive patients with 764 target vessels and 1,000 lesions underwent coronary angioplasty. Procedural success was achieved in 92.3%, untoward (major cardiac) events occurred in 3% (0.8% myocardial infarction, 1.3% emergency coronary bypass grafting and 0.9% both; there were no deaths). An unsuccessful uncomplicated outcome occurred in 4.7%. Lesion analysis using a modified American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association classification system showed that 8% were type A, 47.5% were type B and 44.5% were type C (36% of type B and 11% of type C were occlusions). Angioplasty success was achieved in 99% of type A, 92% of type B and 90% of type C lesions (A vs. B, p less than 0.05; B vs. C, p = NS; A vs. C, p less than 0.01). Untoward events occurred in 1.2% of type A, 1.9% of type B and 2% of type C lesions (p = NS). An unsuccessful uncomplicated outcome occurred in 0% of type A, 6% of type B and 7% of type C lesions (A vs. B, p less than 0.05; B vs. C, p = NS; A vs. C, p less than 0.05). Among the unsuccessful uncomplicated outcome group, occlusion occurred in 49%: 38% of type B and 59% of type C lesions. With B1 and B2 subtypes, success was obtained in 95% and 89.5% and untoward events occurred in 1.5% and 2.3% and an unsuccessful uncomplicated outcome in 3.7% and 8%, respectively. C1 and C2 subtyping showed success in 91% and 86%, untoward events in 1.3% and 6% and an unsuccessful uncomplicated outcome in 7.5% and 8.5%, respectively. Among the 764 vessels, success was obtained in 89.5% and untoward events occurred in 2.5% and an unsuccessful uncomplicated outcome in 8%. Assessment of lesion-vessel combinations showed a less favorable outcome with type C lesions and combinations of A-B, B-C and multiple (more than three lesions) type B and C vessels. Statistical analysis of morphologic factors associated with angioplasty success included absence of (old) occlusion (p less than 0.0001) and unprotected bifurcation lesion (p less than 0.001), decreasing lesion length (p less than 0.003) and no thrombus (p less than 0.03). The only significant factor associated with untoward events was the presence of thrombus (p less than 0.003). Predictors of an unsuccessful uncomplicated outcome included old occlusion (p less than 0.0001) and increasing lesion length (greater than 20 mm) (p less than 0.001), unprotected bifurcation lesion (p less than 0.05) and thrombus (p less than 0.03).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1593061     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90631-v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  29 in total

1.  Safety of low dose heparin in elective coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  K T Koch; J J Piek; R J de Winter; G K David; K Mulder; J G Tijssen; K I Lie
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Dedicated bifurcation stents.

Authors:  Ajith Ananthakrishna Pillai; Balachander Jayaraman
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2012-04-28

3.  Inter- and intra-observer variability in the qualitative categorization of coronary angiograms.

Authors:  J P Herrman; A Azar; V A Umans; E Boersma; G A von Es; P W Serruys
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1996-03

4.  Prediction of success and major complications during elective coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  A P Haasdijk; M J de Boer; H Suryapranata; J C A Hoorntje; F Zijlstra
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 5.  Vascular Lesion-Specific Drug Delivery Systems: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  David Marlevi; Elazer R Edelman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 6.  [Laser angioplasty and recanalization].

Authors:  M Haude; D Welge; L Koch; T Roth; J Ge; D Baumgart; R Erbel
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.443

7.  Does a waiting time for elective coronary angioplasty affect the primary success rate?

Authors:  K T Koch; J J Piek; G K David; K Mulder; R J Peters; K I Lie
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 8.  A new look at coronary angiograms: plaque morphology as a help to diagnosis and to evaluate outcome.

Authors:  J Lespérance; P Théroux; G Hudon; D Waters
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1994-06

9.  Efficacy of a third coronary angioplasty for a second restenosis: short-term results, long-term follow up, and correlates of a third restenosis.

Authors:  K H Tan; N Sulke; N Taub; S Karani; E Sowton
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-04

10.  "DK Crush" Technique for a Tightly Stenosed Conjoined SVG Lesion in a Patient with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Kuan-Ju Chen; Wen-Lieng Lee; Tsun-Jui Liu; Wei-Chun Chang; Kuo-Yang Wang; Chieh-Shou Su
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.672

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.