Literature DB >> 1593011

Selection of dieldrin-resistant strains of Lucilia cuprina (Diptera: Calliphoridae) after ethyl methanesulfonate mutagenesis of a susceptible strain.

K A Smyth1, A G Parker, J L Yen, J A McKenzie.   

Abstract

After ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) mutagenesis of a susceptible strain (SWT), selective screening of Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) resulted in four strains that were resistant to the insecticide dieldrin. Concentrations used for selection were greater than LC99 of susceptible phenotypes. No resistant variants were screened from the standard laboratory strain (SWT) not treated with EMS. The resistance phenotypes of the four resistant strains were similar to each other and to that of a field-selected resistant strain. The genetic basis of resistance is monogenic in all strains and the data are consistent with the same locus, Rdl, determining resistance status in each strain. The Rdl locus maps to chromosome V, approximately 3.5 map units distal to the Sut locus. Dieldrin resistance may be caused by less effective blocking of insect neuronal GABA receptors by the chemical in resistant strains. The data indicate that the evolution of resistance to an insecticide in the field may be constrained by a limited number of genetical and biochemical options if a monogenic response is selected for and that the spontaneous mutation rate to the Rdl allele is less than 1 in 10(6) in the laboratory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1593011     DOI: 10.1093/jee/85.2.352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Entomol        ISSN: 0022-0493            Impact factor:   2.381


  3 in total

1.  Scalloped wings is the Lucilia cuprina Notch homologue and a candidate for the modifier of fitness and asymmetry of diazinon resistance.

Authors:  A G Davies; A Y Game; Z Chen; T J Williams; S Goodall; J L Yen; J A McKenzie; P Batterham
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Predicting insecticide resistance: mutagenesis, selection and response.

Authors:  J A McKenzie; P Batterham
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Scientific standards and the regulation of genetically modified insects.

Authors:  R Guy Reeves; Jai A Denton; Fiammetta Santucci; Jarosław Bryk; Floyd A Reed
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2012-01-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.