Literature DB >> 15928412

Naive coadaptive cortical control.

Gregory J Gage1, Kip A Ludwig, Kevin J Otto, Edward L Ionides, Daryl R Kipke.   

Abstract

The ability to control a prosthetic device directly from the neocortex has been demonstrated in rats, monkeys and humans. Here we investigate whether neural control can be accomplished in situations where (1) subjects have not received prior motor training to control the device (naive user) and (2) the neural encoding of movement parameters in the cortex is unknown to the prosthetic device (naive controller). By adopting a decoding strategy that identifies and focuses on units whose firing rate properties are best suited for control, we show that naive subjects mutually adapt to learn control of a neural prosthetic system. Six untrained Long-Evans rats, implanted with silicon micro-electrodes in the motor cortex, learned cortical control of an auditory device without prior motor characterization of the recorded neural ensemble. Single- and multi-unit activities were decoded using a Kalman filter to represent an audio "cursor" (90 ms tone pips ranging from 250 Hz to 16 kHz) which subjects controlled to match a given target frequency. After each trial, a novel adaptive algorithm trained the decoding filter based on correlations of the firing patterns with expected cursor movement. Each behavioral session consisted of 100 trials and began with randomized decoding weights. Within 7 +/- 1.4 (mean +/- SD) sessions, all subjects were able to significantly score above chance (P < 0.05, randomization method) in a fixed target paradigm. Training lasted 24 sessions in which both the behavioral performance and signal to noise ratio of the peri-event histograms increased significantly (P < 0.01, ANOVA). Two rats continued training on a more complex task using a bilateral, two-target control paradigm. Both subjects were able to significantly discriminate the target tones (P < 0.05, Z-test), while one subject demonstrated control above chance (P < 0.05, Z-test) after 12 sessions and continued improvement with many sessions achieving over 90% correct targets. Dynamic analysis of binary trial responses indicated that early learning for this subject occurred during session 6. This study demonstrates that subjects can learn to generate neural control signals that are well suited for use with external devices without prior experience or training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15928412     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/2/2/006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  29 in total

1.  Neural decoding based on probabilistic neural network.

Authors:  Yi Yu; Shao-min Zhang; Huai-jian Zhang; Xiao-chun Liu; Qiao-sheng Zhang; Xiao-xiang Zheng; Jian-hua Dai
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Efficient decoding with steady-state Kalman filter in neural interface systems.

Authors:  Wasim Q Malik; Wilson Truccolo; Emery N Brown; Leigh R Hochberg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 3.  The development of brain-machine interface neuroprosthetic devices.

Authors:  Parag G Patil; Dennis A Turner
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  Neural decoding of hand motion using a linear state-space model with hidden states.

Authors:  Wei Wu; Jayant E Kulkarni; Nicholas G Hatsopoulos; Liam Paninski
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Real-time decoding of nonstationary neural activity in motor cortex.

Authors:  Wei Wu; Nicholas G Hatsopoulos
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Affective Brain-Computer Interfaces As Enabling Technology for Responsive Psychiatric Stimulation.

Authors:  Alik S Widge; Darin D Dougherty; Chet T Moritz
Journal:  Brain Comput Interfaces (Abingdon)       Date:  2014-04-01

Review 7.  Parsing learning in networks using brain-machine interfaces.

Authors:  Amy L Orsborn; Bijan Pesaran
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Pre-frontal control of closed-loop limbic neurostimulation by rodents using a brain-computer interface.

Authors:  Alik S Widge; Chet T Moritz
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 9.  Neural interface technology for rehabilitation: exploiting and promoting neuroplasticity.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Jennifer L Collinger; Monica A Perez; Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara; Leonardo G Cohen; Niels Birbaumer; Steven W Brose; Andrew B Schwartz; Michael L Boninger; Douglas J Weber
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.784

10.  Improving brain-machine interface performance by decoding intended future movements.

Authors:  Francis R Willett; Aaron J Suminski; Andrew H Fagg; Nicholas G Hatsopoulos
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.