Literature DB >> 15927661

Variation in hominoid molar enamel thickness.

Tanya M Smith1, Anthony J Olejniczak, Lawrence B Martin, Donald J Reid.   

Abstract

Enamel thickness has figured prominently in discussions of hominid origins for nearly a century, although little is known about its intra-taxon variation. It has been suggested that enamel thickness increases from first to third molars, perhaps due to varying functional demands or developmental constraints, but this has not been tested with appropriate statistical methods. We quantified enamel cap area (c), dentine area (b), and enamel-dentine junction length (e) in coronal planes of sections through the mesial and distal cusps in 57 permanent molars of Pan and 59 of Pongo, and calculated average (c/e) and relative enamel thickness (([c/e]/ radicalb) * 100). Posteriorly increasing or decreasing trends in each variable and average (AET) and relative enamel thickness (RET) were tested among molars in the same row. Differences between maxillary and mandibular analogues and between mesial and distal sections of the same tooth were also examined. In mesial sections of both genera, enamel cap area significantly increased posteriorly, except in Pan maxillary sections. In distal sections of maxillary teeth, trends of decreasing dentine area were significant in both taxa, possibly due to hypocone reduction. Significant increases in AET and RET posteriorly were found in all comparisons, except for AET in Pongo distal maxillary sections. Several significant differences were found between maxillary and mandibular analogues in both taxa. Relative to their mesial counterparts, distal sections showed increased enamel cap area and/or decreased dentine area, and thus increased AET and RET. This study indicates that when AET and RET are calculated from samples of mixed molars, variability is exaggerated due to the lumping of tooth types. To maximize taxonomic discrimination using enamel thickness, tooth type and section plane should be taken into account. Nonetheless, previous findings that African apes have relatively thinner enamel than Pongo is supported for certain molar positions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15927661     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2005.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  12 in total

1.  Enamel thickness in the Middle Miocene great apes Anoiapithecus, Pierolapithecus and Dryopithecus.

Authors:  D M Alba; J Fortuny; S Moyà-Solà
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Appositional enamel growth in molars of South African fossil hominids.

Authors:  Rodrigo S Lacruz; Timothy G Bromage
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Three-dimensional molar enamel distribution and thickness in Australopithecus and Paranthropus.

Authors:  A J Olejniczak; T M Smith; M M Skinner; F E Grine; R N M Feeney; J F Thackeray; J-J Hublin
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-08-23       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 4.  Inferences regarding the diet of extinct hominins: structural and functional trends in dental and mandibular morphology within the hominin clade.

Authors:  Peter W Lucas; Paul J Constantino; Bernard A Wood
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Fracture mechanics, enamel thickness and the evolution of molar form in hominins.

Authors:  Gary T Schwartz; Amanda McGrosky; David S Strait
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  A new Miocene ape and locomotion in the ancestor of great apes and humans.

Authors:  Madelaine Böhme; Nikolai Spassov; Jochen Fuss; Adrian Tröscher; Andrew S Deane; Jérôme Prieto; Uwe Kirscher; Thomas Lechner; David R Begun
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Strategies for the Use of Fallback Foods in Apes.

Authors:  Mark E Harrison; Andrew J Marshall
Journal:  Int J Primatol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  First early hominin from central Africa (Ishango, Democratic Republic of Congo).

Authors:  Isabelle Crevecoeur; Matthew M Skinner; Shara E Bailey; Philipp Gunz; Silvia Bortoluzzi; Alison S Brooks; Christian Burlet; Els Cornelissen; Nora De Clerck; Bruno Maureille; Patrick Semal; Yves Vanbrabant; Bernard Wood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Quantification of the dental morphology of orangutans.

Authors:  P Nambiar; J John; Samah M Al-Amery; K Purmal; W L Chai; W C Ngeow; N H Mohamed; S Vellayan
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-11-18

10.  Internal Tooth Structure and Burial Practices: Insights into the Neolithic Necropolis of Gurgy (France, 5100-4000 cal. BC).

Authors:  Mona Le Luyer; Michael Coquerelle; Stéphane Rottier; Priscilla Bayle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.