Literature DB >> 15925769

Deep brain stimulation for phantom limb pain.

Richard G Bittar1, Sofia Otero, Helen Carter, Tipu Z Aziz.   

Abstract

Phantom limb pain is an often severe and debilitating phenomenon that has been reported in up to 85% of amputees. Its pathophysiology is poorly understood. Peripheral and spinal mechanisms are thought to play a role in pain modulation in affected individuals; however central mechanisms are also likely to be of importance. The neuromatrix theory postulates a genetically determined representation of body image, which is modified by sensory input to create a neurosignature. Persistence of the neurosignature may be responsible for painless phantom limb sensations, whereas phantom limb pain may be due to abnormal reorganisation within the neuromatrix. This study assessed the clinical outcome of deep brain stimulation of the periventricular grey matter and somatosensory thalamus for the relief of chronic neuropathic pain associated with phantom limb in three patients. These patients were assessed preoperatively and at 3 month intervals postoperatively. Self-rated visual analogue scale pain scores assessed pain intensity, and the McGill Pain Questionnaire assessed the quality of the pain. Quality of life was assessed using the EUROQOL EQ-5D scale. Periventricular gray stimulation alone was optimal in two patients, whilst a combination of periventricular gray and thalamic stimulation produced the greatest degree of relief in one patient. At follow-up (mean 13.3 months) the intensity of pain was reduced by 62% (range 55-70%). In all three patients, the burning component of the pain was completely alleviated. Opiate intake was reduced in the two patients requiring morphine sulphate pre-operatively. Quality of life measures indicated a statistically significant improvement. This data supports the role for deep brain stimulation in patients with phantom limb pain. The medical literature relating to the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and treatment of this clinical entity is reviewed in detail.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15925769     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2004.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  20 in total

Review 1.  Invasive brain stimulation for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Nguyen; Julien Nizard; Yves Keravel; Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 42.937

2.  Deep brain stimulation complicated by bilateral large cystic cavitation around the leads in a patient with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Jonathan Jagid; Karthik Madhavan; Amade Bregy; Mehul Desai; Armando Ruiz; Robert Quencer; Howard J Landy
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-10-16

Review 3.  Deep Brain Stimulation for Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Steven M Falowski
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2015-07

Review 4.  Neuropathic pain and deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Erlick A C Pereira; Tipu Z Aziz
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 5.  Coping with Phantom Limb Pain.

Authors:  Damien P Kuffler
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.590

Review 6.  Deep brain stimulation and motor cortical stimulation for neuropathic pain.

Authors:  James A Stadler; Damien J Ellens; Joshua M Rosenow
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2011-02

Review 7.  Brain stimulation in the treatment of chronic neuropathic and non-cancerous pain.

Authors:  Ela B Plow; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Andre Machado
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2012-04-07       Impact factor: 5.820

8.  Neuromodulation Techniques in Phantom Limb Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Pacheco-Barrios; Xianguo Meng; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 9.  Deep brain stimulation for chronic pain: intracranial targets, clinical outcomes, and trial design considerations.

Authors:  Orion Paul Keifer; Jonathan P Riley; Nicholas M Boulis
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.509

10.  Quantifying the effects of the electrode-brain interface on the crossing electric currents in deep brain recording and stimulation.

Authors:  N Yousif; R Bayford; S Wang; X Liu
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.