Ren Guo Xie1, Jin Bo Tang. 1. Department of Hand Surgery, Hand Surgery Research Center, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Locking sutures have proven beneficial to the strength of the repaired tendon. In this study we investigated the effects of 3 locks in the tendon-suture junction and their effect on repair strength. METHODS: Forty-seven fresh pig flexor tendons were transected and repaired using 4-strand repairs with 3 different configurations of locks in each tendon-suture junction: 1 exposed cross-lock, 1 embedded cross-lock, and 1 circle lock. The tendons were subjected to a linear noncyclic load-to-failure test using a tensile testing machine. The initial gap, the 2-mm gap force, and the ultimate strength were measured to compare the biomechanical performance for each repair. RESULTS: Despite noticeable differences in the configurations of locks the gap formation force and ultimate strength were not significantly different among the 3 tested locking configurations. CONCLUSIONS: An exposed cross-lock, an embedded cross-lock, and a circle lock at tendon-suture junctions had similar locking power. Circle-lock repairs without cross-locking components produce tensile strength similar to cross-locking repairs. The findings of this study suggest that the creation of cross-configurations in locking repairs used conventionally by many surgeons is not essential to repair strength and that circle locking is as efficient as cross-locking in the repair of lacerated flexor tendons.
PURPOSE: Locking sutures have proven beneficial to the strength of the repaired tendon. In this study we investigated the effects of 3 locks in the tendon-suture junction and their effect on repair strength. METHODS: Forty-seven fresh pig flexor tendons were transected and repaired using 4-strand repairs with 3 different configurations of locks in each tendon-suture junction: 1 exposed cross-lock, 1 embedded cross-lock, and 1 circle lock. The tendons were subjected to a linear noncyclic load-to-failure test using a tensile testing machine. The initial gap, the 2-mm gap force, and the ultimate strength were measured to compare the biomechanical performance for each repair. RESULTS: Despite noticeable differences in the configurations of locks the gap formation force and ultimate strength were not significantly different among the 3 tested locking configurations. CONCLUSIONS: An exposed cross-lock, an embedded cross-lock, and a circle lock at tendon-suture junctions had similar locking power. Circle-lock repairs without cross-locking components produce tensile strength similar to cross-locking repairs. The findings of this study suggest that the creation of cross-configurations in locking repairs used conventionally by many surgeons is not essential to repair strength and that circle locking is as efficient as cross-locking in the repair of lacerated flexor tendons.
Authors: Daniel A Osei; Jeffrey G Stepan; Ryan P Calfee; Stavros Thomopoulos; Martin I Boyer; Ryan Potter; Richard H Gelberman Journal: J Hand Surg Am Date: 2013-12-15 Impact factor: 2.230
Authors: Cormac W Joyce; Conor Sugrue; Jeffrey C Chan; Luis Delgado; Dimitrios Zeugolis; Seam M Carroll; Jack L Kelly Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2014-11-07
Authors: Weifeng Zeng; Nicholas J Albano; Ruston J Sanchez; Ronald Mccabe; Ray Vanderby; Samuel O Poore; Aaron M Dingle Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2020-12-17