Literature DB >> 15925045

Induction of labor with three different techniques at 41 weeks of gestation or spontaneous follow-up until 42 weeks in women with definitely unfavorable cervical scores.

O Gelisen1, E Caliskan, S Dilbaz, E Ozdas, B Dilbaz, E Ozdas, A Haberal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the obstetric outcome of induction of labor at 41 weeks and of follow-up until 42 weeks and induction if the patient has still not given birth at 42 weeks. STUDY
DESIGN: Six hundred women at 287+/-1 days of gestation with definitely unfavorable cervical scores were randomized to labor induction (N=300) or spontaneous follow-up (N=300) with twice-weekly nonstress testing and amniotic fluid measurement and once-weekly biophysical scoring. The treatments used in the induction group were (1) vaginal administration of 50 microg misoprostol (n=100), (2) oxytocin induction (n=100), and (3) transcervical insertion of a Foley balloon (n=100). The primary outcome measures were the cesarean delivery rate, whether or not the normal hospital stay had to be extended, and the neonatal outcomes. Secondary outcome measure included number of emergency cesarean deliveries performed for abnormalities of the fetal heart rate (FHR).
RESULTS: The abdominal delivery rate was 19.3% in the induction group and 22% in the follow-up group (p=0.4). The mean length of hospital stay in the two main groups was 1.4+/-0.8 days and 1.3+/-1 days, respectively (p=0.1). Significantly higher rates of macrosomia and shoulder dystocia were seen in the follow-up group (24.6 and 2.3%) than in the induction group (7.6%, p<0.001; 0.3%, p=0.03). Meconium-stained amniotic fluid and meconium aspiration syndrome were observed significantly less frequently in the induction group (9.3 and 1.3%) than in the follow-up group (20.3%, p<0.001; 4%, p=0.03). Rates of emergency abdominal delivery in response to worrying FHR traces, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and low umblical artery pH were similar in the two groups. There was one intrauterine fetal death in the follow-up group.
CONCLUSION: Induction of labor at 41 weeks of gestation does not increase the cesarean delivery rate or cause a longer stay in hospital than follow-up until 42 weeks, and neonatal morbidity is also lower after induction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15925045     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  15 in total

Review 1.  Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.

Authors:  G Justus Hofmeyr; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Cynthia Pileggi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-10-06

Review 2.  Caesarean Delivery Rate Review: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors:  N Degani; N Sikich
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2015-03-01

Review 3.  Timing of delivery in women with diabetes in pregnancy.

Authors:  Howard Berger; Nir Melamed
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2014-01-15

Review 4.  Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.

Authors:  A Metin Gülmezoglu; Caroline A Crowther; Philippa Middleton; Emer Heatley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-06-13

5.  Elective induction of labour and expectant management in late-term pregnancy: A prospective cohort study alongside the INDEX randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Aafke Bruinsma; Judit Kj Keulen; Joep C Kortekaas; Jeroen van Dillen; Ruben G Duijnhoven; Patrick Mm Bossuyt; Anton H van Kaam; Joris Am van der Post; Ben W Mol; Esteriek de Miranda
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2022-10-03

6.  Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation.

Authors:  Philippa Middleton; Emily Shepherd; Jonathan Morris; Caroline A Crowther; Judith C Gomersall
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-15

Review 7.  Elective induction for pregnancies at or beyond 41 weeks of gestation and its impact on stillbirths: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arwa Abbas Hussain; Mohammad Yawar Yakoob; Aamer Imdad; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Induction of labor and risk of postpartum hemorrhage in low risk parturients.

Authors:  Imane Khireddine; Camille Le Ray; Corinne Dupont; René-Charles Rudigoz; Marie-Hélène Bouvier-Colle; Catherine Deneux-Tharaux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Mechanical methods for induction of labour.

Authors:  Marieke Dt de Vaan; Mieke Lg Ten Eikelder; Marta Jozwiak; Kirsten R Palmer; Miranda Davies-Tuck; Kitty Wm Bloemenkamp; Ben Willem J Mol; Michel Boulvain
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-18

Review 10.  Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.

Authors:  Philippa Middleton; Emily Shepherd; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.