| Literature DB >> 15925035 |
Chella Kamarajan1, Bernice Porjesz, Kevin A Jones, Keewhan Choi, David B Chorlian, Ajayan Padmanabhapillai, Madhavi Rangaswamy, Arthur T Stimus, Henri Begleiter.
Abstract
Response inhibition is considered a core dimension in alcoholism and its co-existing disorders. The major objective of this study is to compare the magnitude and spatial distribution of ERP components during response activation and inhibition in alcoholics (N = 30) and normal controls (N = 30) using a visual Go/No-Go task. The results indicate that alcoholics manifest a decreased P3(00) amplitude during Go as well as No-Go conditions. The difference between Go and No-Go processing was more evident in controls than in alcoholics. The topography of current source density in alcoholics during the P3 response was found to be very different from that of normals, suggesting that alcoholics perhaps activated inappropriate brain circuitry during cognitive processing. The significantly reduced No-Go P3 along with the relatively less anteriorized CSD topography during No-Go condition suggests poor inhibitory control in alcoholics. It is proposed that the No-Go P3, the electrophysiological signature of response inhibition, can be considered as an endophenotypic marker in alcoholism.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15925035 PMCID: PMC3758477 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.08.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Psychol ISSN: 0301-0511 Impact factor: 3.251