Literature DB >> 15924505

Dose adjustment in patients with liver disease.

Fabiola Delcò1, Lydia Tchambaz, Raymond Schlienger, Jürgen Drewe, Stephan Krähenbühl.   

Abstract

Unfortunately, there is no endogenous marker for hepatic clearance that can be used as a guide for drug dosing. In order to predict the kinetic behaviour of drugs in cirrhotic patients, agents can be grouped according to their extent of hepatic extraction. For drugs with a high hepatic extraction (low bioavailability in healthy subjects), bioavailability increases and hepatic clearance decreases in cirrhotic patients. If such drugs are administered orally to cirrhotic patients, their initial dose has to be reduced according to hepatic extraction. Furthermore, their maintenance dose has to be adapted irrespective of the route of administration, if possible, according to kinetic studies in cirrhotic patients. For drugs with a low hepatic extraction, bioavailability is not affected by liver disease, but hepatic clearance may be affected. For such drugs, only the maintenance dose has to be reduced, according to the estimated decrease in hepatic drug metabolism. For drugs with an intermediate hepatic extraction, initial oral doses should be chosen in the low range of normal in cirrhotic patients and maintenance doses should be reduced as for high extraction drugs. In cholestatic patients, the clearance of drugs with predominant biliary elimination may be impaired. Guidelines for dose reduction in cholestasis exist for many antineoplastic drugs, but are mostly lacking for other drugs with biliary elimination. Dose adaptation of such drugs in cholestatic patients is, therefore, difficult and has to be performed according to pharmacological effect and/or toxicity. Importantly, the dose of drugs with predominant renal elimination may also have to be adapted in patients with liver disease. Cirrhotic patients often have impaired renal function, despite a normal serum creatinine level. In cirrhotic patients, creatinine clearance should, therefore, be measured or estimated to gain a guideline for the dosing of drugs with predominant renal elimination. Since the creatinine clearance tends to overestimate glomerular filtration in cirrhotic patients, the dose of a given drug may still be too high after adaptation to creatinine clearance. Therefore, the clinical monitoring of pharmacological effects and toxicity of such drugs is important. Besides the mentioned kinetic changes, the dynamics of some drugs is also altered in cirrhotic patients. Examples include opiates, benzodiazepines, NSAIDs and diuretics. Such drugs may exhibit unusual adverse effects that clinicians should be aware of for their safe use. However, it is important to realise that the recommendations for dose adaptation remain general and cannot replace accurate clinical monitoring of patients with liver disease treated with critical drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15924505     DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200528060-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  127 in total

1.  Glomerular filtration rate measurement in cirrhotic patients with renal failure.

Authors:  L Roy; L Legault; G Pomier-Layrargues
Journal:  Clin Nephrol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 0.975

2.  Steady-state extrarenal sorbitol clearance as a measure of hepatic plasma flow.

Authors:  J Zeeh; H Lange; J Bosch; S Pohl; H Loesgen; R Eggers; M Navasa; J Chesta; J Bircher
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Cimetidine administration and tubular creatinine secretion in patients with compensated cirrhosis.

Authors:  Giovanni Sansoè; Alberto Ferrari; Carmen Nives Castellana; Lorenzo Bonardi; Erica Villa; Federico Manenti
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.124

4.  Pharmacokinetics of chlormethiazole in healthy volunteers and patients with cirrhosis of the liver.

Authors:  P J Pentikäinen; P J Neuvonen; K G Jostell
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Creatinine clearance: an inadequate marker of renal filtration in patients with early posthepatitic cirrhosis (Child A) without fluid retention and muscle wasting.

Authors:  N G DeSanto; P Anastasio; C Loguercio; L Spitali; C Del Vecchio Blanco; M Corvinelli; M Cirillo
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.847

6.  Different alterations of cytochrome P450 3A4 isoform and its gene expression in livers of patients with chronic liver diseases.

Authors:  Li-Qun Yang; Shen-Jing Li; Yun-Fei Cao; Xiao-Bo Man; Wei-Feng Yu; Hong-Yang Wang; Meng-Chao Wu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Pharmacokinetics of zidovudine in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Authors:  A M Taburet; S Naveau; G Zorza; J N Colin; J F Delfraissy; J C Chaput; E Singlas
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  Pharmacokinetics of midazolam following intravenous and oral administration in patients with chronic liver disease and in healthy subjects.

Authors:  P J Pentikäinen; L Välisalmi; J J Himberg; C Crevoisier
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.126

9.  The pharmacokinetics of vincristine in man: reduced drug clearance associated with raised serum alkaline phosphatase and dose-limited elimination.

Authors:  H W Van den Berg; Z R Desai; R Wilson; G Kennedy; J M Bridges; R G Shanks
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Nisoldipine: kinetics and effects on blood pressure and heart rate in patients with liver cirrhosis after intravenous and oral administration.

Authors:  J van Harten; P van Brummelen; J H Wilson; M T Lodewijks; D D Breimer
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.953

View more
  60 in total

Review 1.  Dose adaptation of antineoplastic drugs in patients with liver disease.

Authors:  Lydia Tchambaz; Chantal Schlatter; Max Jakob; Anita Krähenbühl; Peter Wolf; Stephan Krähenbühl
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Prednisone Pharmacokinetics During Pregnancy and Lactation.

Authors:  Rachel J Ryu; Thomas R Easterling; Steve N Caritis; Raman Venkataramanan; Jason G Umans; Mahmoud S Ahmed; Shannon Clark; Ira Kantrowitz-Gordon; Karen Hays; Brooke Bennett; Matthew T Honaker; Kenneth E Thummel; Danny D Shen; Mary F Hebert
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.126

Review 3.  Rationale for faster oral delivery to overcome the pathophysiology associated with dental pain--biopharmaceutic and pharmacokinetic challenges.

Authors:  Nuggehally R Srinivas
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.441

4.  Pharmacokinetic changes after placement of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.

Authors:  Sabrina De Winter; Sandra Verelst; Joost Wauters; Lorenz Van der Linden; Chris Verslype; Ludo Willems; Isabel Spriet
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 5.  The pharmacology of novel oral anticoagulants.

Authors:  Tracy A DeWald; Richard C Becker
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 6.  Pain management in the cirrhotic patient: the clinical challenge.

Authors:  Natasha Chandok; Kymberly D S Watt
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Interpretation of drug concentrations in an alternative matrix: the case of meprobamate in bile.

Authors:  L Fanton; F Bevalot; M P Gustin; C Z Paultre; C Le Meur; D Malicier
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 2.686

8.  Experimental nonalcoholic steatohepatitis increases exposure to simvastatin hydroxy acid by decreasing hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptide expression.

Authors:  John D Clarke; Rhiannon N Hardwick; April D Lake; Mark J Canet; Nathan J Cherrington
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 9.  Anticoagulant therapy with the oral direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban and the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate in patients with hepatic impairment.

Authors:  Jochen Graff; Sebastian Harder
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Dose adjustment in patients with liver cirrhosis: impact on adverse drug reactions and hospitalizations.

Authors:  Carmen C Franz; Carole Hildbrand; Christa Born; Sabin Egger; Alexandra E Rätz Bravo; Stephan Krähenbühl
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.