Literature DB >> 15924273

Department of Defense picture archiving and communication system acceptance testing: results and identification of problem components.

Scott A Allison1, Clifford F Sweet, Douglas P Beall, Thomas E Lewis, Thomas Monroe.   

Abstract

The PACS implementation process is complicated requiring a tremendous amount of time, resources, and planning. The Department of Defense (DOD) has significant experience in developing and refining PACS acceptance testing (AT) protocols that assure contract compliance, clinical safety, and functionality. The DOD's AT experience under the initial Medical Diagnostic Imaging Support System contract led to the current Digital Imaging Network-Picture Archiving and Communications Systems (DIN-PACS) contract AT protocol. To identify the most common system and component deficiencies under the current DIN-PACS AT protocol, 14 tri-service sites were evaluated during 1998-2000. Sixteen system deficiency citations with 154 separate types of limitations were noted with problems involving the workstation, interfaces, and the Radiology Information System comprising more than 50% of the citations. Larger PACS deployments were associated with a higher number of deficiencies. The most commonly cited systems deficiencies were among the most expensive components of the PACS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15924273      PMCID: PMC3046717          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-005-5164-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  4 in total

1.  The philosophy of benchmark testing a standards-based picture archiving and communications system.

Authors:  N E Richardson; J A Thomas; D K Lyche; J Romlein; G S Norton; Q E Dolecek
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Benchmark testing the Digital Imaging Network-Picture Archiving and Communications System proposal of the Department of Defense.

Authors:  P D Shelton; D K Lyche; G S Norton; J Romlein; D P Lawrence; M A Cawthon; J A Thomas; N Richardson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Acceptance testing of integrated picture archiving and communications systems.

Authors:  T E Lewis; M C Horton; T V Kinsey; P D Shelton
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 4.  AAPM/RSNA tutorial on equipment selection: PACS equipment overview: general guidelines for purchasing and acceptance testing of PACS equipment.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; J Anthony Seibert; Katherine Andriole; Aldo Badano; Jay Crawford; Bruce Reiner; Michael J Flynn; Paul Chang
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  A socio-technical assessment of the success of Picture Archiving and Communication Systems: the radiology technologist's perspective.

Authors:  Wen-Sheng Tzeng; Kuang-Ming Kuo; Huang-Wei Lin; Tai-Yuan Chen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 2.796

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.