Literature DB >> 15923802

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell rescue for metastatic breast cancer: superior survival for tandem compared with single transplants.

Robert O Dillman1, Neil M Barth, Louis A VanderMolen, Kanoe Allen, Linda D Beutel, Sherri Chico.   

Abstract

During 1990-1999, we treated 60 patients with breast cancer who had distant metastases with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell rescue (HDC) after they had responded to induction chemotherapy. HDC regimens were MiTepa (60 mg/m2 mitoxantrone by continuous intravenous infusion over 3 days plus 300 mg/m2 thiotepa intravenously over 2 hours daily x 3 days) and ICE (12 g/m2 ifosfamide, 1800 mg/m2 carboplatin, 2 g/m2 etoposide; all 3 by continuous intravenous over 4 days). At a median follow up >8 years, the median failure-free survival (FFS) was 13.9 months, median overall survival (OS) 29.1 months, 5-year FFS 12%s and 5-year OS 25%. Thirty-three patients underwent tandem (T) transplants; 27 underwent a single (S) HDC. Median ages for these 2 groups were 45 and 48 years; bone and liver metastases were more prevalent in the T cohort, whereas lung metastases were more prevalent in the S cohort. At a median follow up of 6.5 years for the S group and >9 years for the T group, there were 52 deaths. FFS was better for T: median 15.7 versus 7.7 months (p2 = 0.010) as was OS: median 32.7 versus 17.7 months, 2-year survival 68% versus 41%, and 5-year survival 32% versus 15% (p2 = 0.010). As a group, patients with distant metastatic breast cancer who underwent tandem transplants had a better posttransplant survival than patients who underwent a single HDC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15923802     DOI: 10.1097/01.coc.0000156917.43490.65

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  4 in total

1.  Cancer patient survival improvement is correlated with the opening of a community cancer center: comparisons with intramural and extramural benchmarks.

Authors:  Robert O Dillman; Sherri D Chico
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Salinomycin sensitizes cancer cells to the effects of doxorubicin and etoposide treatment by increasing DNA damage and reducing p21 protein.

Authors:  Ju-Hwa Kim; Minji Chae; Won Ki Kim; You-Jin Kim; Han Sung Kang; Hyung Sik Kim; Sungpil Yoon
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 3.  Targeting of cancer stem/progenitor cells plus stem cell-based therapies: the ultimate hope for treating and curing aggressive and recurrent cancers.

Authors:  M Mimeault; S K Batra
Journal:  Panminerva Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.197

Review 4.  Recent advances on the molecular mechanisms involved in the drug resistance of cancer cells and novel targeting therapies.

Authors:  M Mimeault; R Hauke; S K Batra
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 6.875

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.