Literature DB >> 15923146

Patient experiences following cardiothoracic surgery: an interview study.

Genevieve Gardner1, Doug Elliott, Jaswin Gill, Melanie Griffin, Matthew Crawford.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have investigated patient outcomes of cardiac surgery, including some examining health-related quality of life. While these studies have provided some insight into patients' physical function, social abilities and perceived quality of life, studies examining the experiences of individuals recovering from cardiac surgery have received only limited investigation. AIMS: This paper presents a thematic analysis of interviews conducted with patients recovering from cardiothoracic surgery, about their memories and experiences of hospital and recovery post-hospital discharge.
METHODS: Using an exploratory qualitative approach, eight participants were interviewed 6 months following their surgery. Transcripts of interviews were examined using a content analysis approach, with open coding of text and categorising of similar concepts into themes.
FINDINGS: Participants reported varying degrees of pain and physical dysfunction during their recovery from surgery and some had still not returned to optimal function. Seven themes emerged from the data: impressions of ICU; comfort/discomfort; being sick/getting better; companionship/isolation; hope/hopelessness; acceptance/apprehension; and life changes. A number of the themes were constructed as a continuum, with participants often demonstrating a range of views or experiences. Many had little or no memory of their stay in the intensive care unit, although others had vivid recollections. Their impressions of hospital were mostly positive, although many experienced fear, apprehension, and mood disturbances at some time during their recovery. Most participants recalled being sick, reaching a turning point, and then getting better. Many participants reported a change in life view since their recovery from surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Attention to specific areas of patient orientation, education and support was identified to facilitate realistic expectations of recovery. In addition, some form of systematic follow-up that focuses on patient recovery in terms of both physical and psychological function is important.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15923146     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2005.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs        ISSN: 1474-5151            Impact factor:   3.908


  7 in total

Review 1.  Patient Health Engagement (PHE) model in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS): monitoring patients' engagement and psychological resilience in minimally invasive thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Guendalina Graffigna; Serena Barello
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Patient participation in medication safety during an acute care admission.

Authors:  Lauren McTier; Mari Botti; Maxine Duke
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation-patient satisfaction from a single-center UK experience.

Authors:  Vivienne A Ezzat; Anastasia Chew; James W McCready; Pier D Lambiase; Anthony W Chow; Martin D Lowe; Edward Rowland; Oliver R Segal
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Effectiveness of massage therapy on the mood of patients after open-heart surgery.

Authors:  Sima Babaee; Zahra Shafiei; Mohsen Mir Mohammad Sadeghi; Ahmadreza Yazdan Nik; Mahboobeh Valiani
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2012-02

5.  Experiences of undergoing cardiac surgery among older people diagnosed with postoperative delirium: one year follow-up.

Authors:  Helena Claesson Lingehall; Nina Smulter; Birgitta Olofsson; Elisabeth Lindahl
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2015-03-30

6.  Patient and spouse perceived quality of life five years after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  G A Lee
Journal:  Open Nurs J       Date:  2008-10-09

Review 7.  Surgical complications and their impact on patients' psychosocial well-being: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anna Pinto; Omar Faiz; Rachel Davis; Alex Almoudaris; Charles Vincent
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.