Literature DB >> 15922446

The use of earthworms in ecological soil classification and assessment concepts.

J Römbke1, S Jänsch, W Didden.   

Abstract

Without doubt, earthworms are the most important soil invertebrates in most soils worldwide, in terms of both biomass and activity. Several species are even considered to be ecosystem engineers. Earthworms are also known to influence soil structure, soil chemistry, and, in particular, processes like organic matter decomposition. In addition, standardized sampling methods are available and their taxonomy is well known (even the first PC-aided keys have been developed). For these reasons, earthworms were recognized as a part of ecological classification and assessment schemes early on. However, due to the relatively small number at many sites, they have to be part of a battery approach. By use of examples from The Netherlands (biological indicator of soil quality) and Germany (soil biological site classification), the practicability of the use of earthworms is demonstrated in determining the influence of different anthropogenic land use forms. In these cases, the structure of the earthworm community, as well as their abundance and biomass, were used as endpoints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15922446     DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.03.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf        ISSN: 0147-6513            Impact factor:   6.291


  9 in total

1.  Impact of treated urban wastewater for reuse in agriculture on crop response and soil ecotoxicity.

Authors:  Dalel Belhaj; Bouthaina Jerbi; Mounir Medhioub; John Zhou; Monem Kallel; Habib Ayadi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Effects of long-term irrigation with treated wastewater on soil quality, soil-borne pathogens, and living organisms: case study of the vicinity of El Hajeb (Tunisia).

Authors:  Olfa Hentati; Sana Chaker; Ahmed Wali; Tarek Ayoub; Mohamed Ksibi
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Evidence for avoidance of Ag nanoparticles by earthworms (Eisenia fetida).

Authors:  W A Shoults-Wilson; Oksana I Zhurbich; David H McNear; Olga V Tsyusko; Paul M Bertsch; Jason M Unrine
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Response of digestive enzymes and esterases of ecotoxicological concern in earthworms exposed to chlorpyrifos-treated soils.

Authors:  Juan C Sanchez-Hernandez; Juan Manuel Ríos; Andrés M Attademo
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Inhibition and recovery of biomarkers of earthworm Eisenia fetida after exposure to thiacloprid.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Lan Zhang; Yanning Zhang; Pei Zhang; Hongyun Jiang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Toxicity evaluation of three pesticides on non-target aquatic and soil organisms: commercial formulation versus active ingredient.

Authors:  Joana L Pereira; Sara C Antunes; Bruno B Castro; Catarina R Marques; Ana M M Gonçalves; Fernando Gonçalves; Ruth Pereira
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Self-assemblage and quorum in the earthworm Eisenia fetida (Oligochaete, Lumbricidae).

Authors:  Lara Zirbes; Yves Brostaux; Mark Mescher; Maxime Jason; Eric Haubruge; Jean-Louis Deneubourg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Co-Exposure of Nanopolystyrene and Other Environmental Contaminants-Their Toxic Effects on the Survival and Reproduction of Enchytraeus crypticus.

Authors:  Luís A Mendes; Angela Barreto; Joana Santos; Mónica J B Amorim; Vera L Maria
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-04-15

9.  Chemical properties and toxicity of soils contaminated by mining activity.

Authors:  Baran Agnieszka; Czech Tomasz; Wieczorek Jerzy
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 2.823

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.