Literature DB >> 15922069

Evidence that tactile stimulation inhibits nociceptive sensations produced by innocuous contact cooling.

Barry G Green1, Kate L Schoen.   

Abstract

It was recently shown that stinging, pricking or burning is reliably perceived by some individuals when the skin is cooled to temperatures as mild as 25-30 degrees C. These seemingly paradoxical sensations, which have been termed innocuous-cold nociception (ICN), were significant only when cooling was produced by a thermode resting statically on the skin (static contact); touching an already cooled thermode to the skin (dynamic contact) produced reports of only coolness and cold. The present study investigated the hypothesis that ICN is inhibited by tactile stimulation produced when a thermode contacts the skin. Experiment 1 pitted the tactile hypothesis against an alternative explanation that inhibition results from higher rates of skin cooling during dynamic contact. ICN was measured at three different cooling rates (-1.0, -2.5, -5.0 degrees C/s) when the thermode was resting on the skin or was touched to the skin at the moment cooling began. The results supported the tactile hypothesis: faster cooling rates during static contact led to stronger rather than weaker nociceptive sensations, and ICN was suppressed even when dynamic contact was coincident with the onset of cooling, and thus could not affect cooling rate. Experiment 2 confirmed the latter result and showed that suppression was greatest at 28 degrees C, less at 24 degrees C, and not significant at 18 degrees C. We conclude that dynamic tactile stimulation produced by contact with a surface inhibits the nociceptive component of innocuous but not noxious cooling. The implications of this conclusion for the role of cold perception in behavioral thermoregulation versus haptic perception, and for theories of cold perception in general, are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15922069     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2005.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  10 in total

1.  Threshold and rate sensitivity of low-threshold thermal nociception.

Authors:  Barry G Green; Carol Akirav
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Thermal and nociceptive sensations from menthol and their suppression by dynamic contact.

Authors:  Barry G Green; Kate L Schoen
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Human cutaneous C fibres activated by cooling, heating and menthol.

Authors:  M Campero; T K Baumann; H Bostock; J L Ochoa
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Normal and abnormal coding of somatosensory stimuli causing pain.

Authors:  Steven A Prescott; Qiufu Ma; Yves De Koninck
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Nociceptive sensations evoked from 'spots' in the skin by mild cooling and heating.

Authors:  Barry G Green; Carolyn Roman; Kate Schoen; Hannah Collins
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Temperature perception on the hand during static versus dynamic contact with a surface.

Authors:  Barry G Green
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Mechanical sensibility of nociceptive and non-nociceptive fast-conducting afferents is modulated by skin temperature.

Authors:  M Danilo Boada; James C Eisenach; Douglas G Ririe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 2.974

8.  The influence of bubbles on the perception carbonation bite.

Authors:  Paul M Wise; Madeline Wolf; Stephen R Thom; Bruce Bryant
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Recovery from nerve injury induced behavioral hypersensitivity in rats parallels resolution of abnormal primary sensory afferent signaling.

Authors:  M Danilo Boada; Thomas J Martin; Renee Parker; Timothy T Houle; James C Eisenach; Douglas G Ririe
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 7.926

Review 10.  Human skin wetness perception: psychophysical and neurophysiological bases.

Authors:  Davide Filingeri; George Havenith
Journal:  Temperature (Austin)       Date:  2015-02-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.