Literature DB >> 15921931

Optimal imaging parameters for fiber-orientation estimation in diffusion MRI.

Daniel C Alexander1, Gareth J Barker.   

Abstract

This study uses Monte Carlo simulations to investigate the optimal value of the diffusion weighting factor b for estimating white-matter fiber orientations using diffusion MRI with a standard spherical sampling scheme. We devise an algorithm for determining the optimal echo time, pulse width, and pulse separation in the pulsed-gradient spin-echo sequence for a specific value of b. The Monte Carlo simulations provide an estimate of the optimal value of b for recovering one and two fiber orientations. We show that the optimum is largely independent of the noise level in the measurements and the number of gradient directions and that the optimum depends only weakly on the diffusion anisotropy, the maximum gradient strength, and the spin-spin relaxation time. The optimum depends strongly on the mean diffusivity. In brain tissue, the optima we estimate are in the ranges [0.7, 1.0] x 10(9) s m(-2) and [2.2, 2.8] x 10(9) s m(-2) for the one- and two-fiber cases, respectively. The best b for estimating the fractional anisotropy is slightly higher than for estimating fiber directions in the one-fiber case and slightly lower in the two-fiber case. To estimate Tr(D) in the one-fiber case, the optimal setting is higher still. Simulations suggest that a ratio of high to low b measurements of 5 to 1 is a good compromise for measuring fiber directions and size and shape indices.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15921931     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  85 in total

1.  An ex vivo imaging pipeline for producing high-quality and high-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging datasets.

Authors:  Tim B Dyrby; William F C Baaré; Daniel C Alexander; Jacob Jelsing; Ellen Garde; Lise V Søgaard
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Bilateral language function in callosal agenesis: an fMRI and DTI study.

Authors:  A Riecker; H Ackermann; B Schmitz; J Kassubek; B Herrnberger; C Steinbrink
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2007-03-31       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 3.  Diffusion tensor MR imaging and fiber tractography: technical considerations.

Authors:  P Mukherjee; S W Chung; J I Berman; C P Hess; R G Henry
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Effects of signal-to-noise ratio on the accuracy and reproducibility of diffusion tensor imaging-derived fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, and principal eigenvector measurements at 1.5 T.

Authors:  Jonathan A D Farrell; Bennett A Landman; Craig K Jones; Seth A Smith; Jerry L Prince; Peter C M van Zijl; Susumu Mori
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Spatial frequency analysis of anisotropic drug transport in tumor samples.

Authors:  Stewart Russell; Kimberley S Samkoe; Jason R Gunn; P Jack Hoopes; Thienan A Nguyen; Milo J Russell; Robert R Alfano; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.170

6.  On the estimation of conventional DTI-derived indices by fitting the non-Gaussian DKI model to diffusion-weighted imaging datasets.

Authors:  Marco Giannelli; Stefano Diciotti; Maria Guerrisi; Antonio Claudio Traino; Mario Mascalchi; Carlo Tessa; Nicola Toschi
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Longitudinal white matter microstructural change in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Vincent Pozorski; Jennifer M Oh; Nagesh Adluru; Andrew P Merluzzi; Frances Theisen; Ozioma Okonkwo; Amy Barzgari; Stephanie Krislov; Jitka Sojkova; Barbara B Bendlin; Sterling C Johnson; Andrew L Alexander; Catherine L Gallagher
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  A comparison of structural connectivity in anxious depression versus non-anxious depression.

Authors:  Lauren Delaparte; Fang-Cheng Yeh; Phil Adams; Ashley Malchow; Madhukar H Trivedi; Maria A Oquendo; Thilo Deckersbach; Todd Ogden; Diego A Pizzagalli; Maurizio Fava; Crystal Cooper; Melvin McInnis; Benji T Kurian; Myrna M Weissman; Patrick J McGrath; Daniel N Klein; Ramin V Parsey; Christine DeLorenzo
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 4.791

9.  Empirical consideration of the effects of acquisition parameters and analysis model on clinically feasible q-ball imaging.

Authors:  Kurt G Schilling; Vishwesh Nath; Justin A Blaber; Prasanna Parvathaneni; Adam W Anderson; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 2.546

10.  Q-ball imaging models: comparison between high and low angular resolution diffusion-weighted MRI protocols for investigation of brain white matter integrity.

Authors:  Giuseppina Caiazzo; Francesca Trojsi; Mario Cirillo; Gioacchino Tedeschi; Fabrizio Esposito
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.