Literature DB >> 15920673

Ecological conservation through aesthetic landscape planning: a case study of the Lower Wisconsin State Riverway.

Brack W Hale1, Michelle M Steen-Adams, Katie Predick, Nick Fisher.   

Abstract

A consequence of expanding residential development into rural areas is the potential alteration of ecological communities. Certain novel land-use policies seek practical solutions by accommodating social needs for housing while conserving biodiversity. This study investigates whether regulations designed to protect the aesthetic characteristics of a river corridor simultaneously mitigate negative effects of development on avian biodiversity, despite the absence of explicit conservation objectives. Using housing data from the US Census (1990 and 2000) and the Audubon Christmas Bird Count (1987-2000), we examined changes in housing density, avian communities, and the relationship between these two variables in a location that has adopted aesthetic landscape planning, the Lower Wisconsin State Riverway. We found that overall species diversity increased in the Riverway, but remained constant in reference areas, although the relative increase in housing density in the two areas did not differ. We also found that omnivore populations decreased in the Riverway and increased in reference sites. On the whole, our study provides preliminary evidence that aesthetic landscape planning, such as employed in the Lower Wisconsin State Riverway, might constitute a politically viable approach to conserve ecological resources.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15920673     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-003-3061-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  4 in total

1.  The Role of Riparian Corridors in Maintaining Regional Biodiversity.

Authors:  Robert J Naiman; Henri Decamps; Michael Pollock
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.657

2.  Preserving Biodiversity: Species, Ecosystems, or Landscapes?

Authors:  Jerry F Franklin
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.657

3.  A test for comparing diversities based on the Shannon formula.

Authors:  K Hutcheson
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1970-10       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Alleviating spatial conflict between people and biodiversity.

Authors:  Gary W Luck; Taylor H Ricketts; Gretchen C Daily; Marc Imhoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 11.205

  4 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Integrating the aesthetic value of landscapes and biological diversity.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Tribot; Julie Deter; Nicolas Mouquet
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Combining aesthetic with ecological values for landscape sustainability.

Authors:  Dewei Yang; Tao Luo; Tao Lin; Quanyi Qiu; Yunjian Luo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Taxonomic and functional diversity increase the aesthetic value of coralligenous reefs.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Tribot; Nicolas Mouquet; Sébastien Villéger; Michel Raymond; Fabrice Hoff; Pierre Boissery; Florian Holon; Julie Deter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.