Literature DB >> 1592021

Epilepsy, driving laws, and patient disclosure to physicians.

M C Salinsky1, K Wegener, F Sinnema.   

Abstract

To avoid loss of driving privileges, patients with epilepsy may elect not to report seizures to their physician or to the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV). Reporting to the physician may differ depending upon the type of law in effect, i.e., mandatory physician reporting versus patient reporting to the DMV. Nondisclosure to the physician may have important consequences with regard to seizure management. We surveyed patients at two adult seizure clinics to determine the effect of driving laws on patients' reporting to their physician. One hundred fifty-eight patients completed an anonymous questionnaire asking whether they would report a breakthrough seizure under a physician versus a patient DMV reporting system. Under patient reporting, 96% would inform their physician and 56% would report to the DMV. Under physician reporting, 84% would inform their physician. This falls to 72% when considering currently driving patients only. An additional 9-17% of patients would continue to drive with a suspended license. In all, 53% would remain driving under patient reporting and 33% under physician reporting; however, with physician reporting, half of the illegally driving patients would have compromised their medical care, potentially increasing driving risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1592021     DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1992.tb01693.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsia        ISSN: 0013-9580            Impact factor:   5.864


  7 in total

1.  Reporting by physicians of impaired drivers and potentially impaired drivers. The Committee on Bioethical Issues of the Medical Society of the State of New York.

Authors:  J T Berger; F Rosner; P Kark; A J Bennett
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Cross sectional study of reporting of epileptic seizures to general practitioners.

Authors:  J Dalrymple; J Appleby
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-08

3.  Discretionary medical reporting of potentially unfit drivers: a questionnaire-based survey in southeast Switzerland.

Authors:  Sebastian Eggert; Michael J Thali; Matthias Pfäffli
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Multidisciplinary assessment of fitness to drive in brain tumour patients in southwestern Ontario: a grey matter.

Authors:  E Chan; A V Louie; M Hanna; G S Bauman; B J Fisher; D A Palma; G B Rodrigues; A Sathya; D P D'Souza
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Assessing fitness to drive in brain tumour patients: a grey matter of law, ethics, and medicine.

Authors:  A V Louie; E Chan; M Hanna; G S Bauman; B J Fisher; D A Palma; G B Rodrigues; A Warner; D P D'Souza
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 6.  Driving and flying with epilepsy.

Authors:  Joseph F Drazkowski
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.081

7.  Risk of a seizure recurrence after a breakthrough seizure and the implications for driving: further analysis of the standard versus new antiepileptic drugs (SANAD) randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  L J Bonnett; G A Powell; C Tudur Smith; A G Marson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.