Literature DB >> 1591966

Comparison of the human electro-oculographic response to green and near-ultraviolet stimuli.

A L Marchese1, J M Maggiano, A H Friedman.   

Abstract

We recorded the electro-oculogram from 27 normal subjects by means of green and near-ultraviolet (UVA) stimulation. After a 40-minute dark-adaptation period, baseline responses were recorded. In response to the green stimulus, the electro-oculogram increased from this level by an average (+/- standard error of the mean) of 49.5% +/- 4.0%. Although the predicted scotopic effectiveness of the ultraviolet stimulus was more than 3 log units below that of the green stimulus, the near-ultraviolet-induced electro-oculogram increased to an average of 21.9% +/- 3.0% above baseline. This response cannot be due to lens fluorescence to the near-ultraviolet stimulus, since two aphakic subjects had electro-oculographic responses of 32% and 76% above baseline to near-ultraviolet stimuli. Neither the green nor the ultraviolet electro-oculogram changed significantly with age. These large responses to near-ultraviolet stimulation demonstrate the need for standardizing light sources for electro-oculographic testing because the degree of near-ultraviolet irradiance varies considerably according to their design characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1591966     DOI: 10.1007/bf00156571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  11 in total

1.  Some observations on the relationship between the standing potential of the human eye and the bleaching and regeneration of visual purple.

Authors:  G B ARDEN; J H KELSEY
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1962-05       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Light extinction and protein in lens.

Authors:  S Zigman; J Groff; T Yulo; G Griess
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 3.467

3.  Evaluation of optical radiation hazards.

Authors:  D H Sliney; B C Freasier
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1973-01-01       Impact factor: 1.980

4.  Standard for clinical electroretinography. International Standardization Committee.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-06

5.  The ocular dipole--a damped oscillator stimulated by the speed of change in illumination.

Authors:  R Täumer; J Hennig; D Pernice
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Lens proteins and fluorescence.

Authors:  S Lerman
Journal:  Isr J Med Sci       Date:  1972 Aug-Sep

7.  Ocular spectral characteristics as related to hazards from lasers and other light sources.

Authors:  W J Geeraets; E R Berry
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Reduced variability in the electro-oculogram.

Authors:  W M Dawson; T M Maida
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  The importance of defining light parameters in chronobiological studies.

Authors:  A H Friedman
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  Iodopsin.

Authors:  G WALD; P K BROWN; P H SMITH
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1955-05-20       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  1 in total

1.  Is white the right light for the clinical electrooculogram?

Authors:  Paul A Constable; Garima Kapoor
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 2.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.