Literature DB >> 15919545

Visual line bisection in sinistrals and dextrals as a function of hemispace, hand, and scan direction.

Eric E Brodie1, Emma M Dunn.   

Abstract

Visual line bisection was investigated in 26 sinistral and 24 dextral subjects as a function of hemispace, hand and scan direction. An ANOVA revealed significant main effects for hand preference, due to the mean bisection errors of dextral subjects being significantly leftward of those of sinistral subjects; for hand, due to the bisection errors of the left hand being significantly to the left of the right hand; and for scan, due to the bisection errors following a left scan being significantly to the left of a right scan. One significant interaction was found, that between hand and direction of scan, due to a significant difference between left and right hands following a scan from the left but not following a scan from the right. For dextral subjects the leftward bisection errors of the left and right hands following a scan from the left, but not for a scan from the right, differed significantly from the midpoint. For sinistral subjects the leftward bisection errors following a scan from the left and rightward bisection errors following a scan from the right differed significantly from the midpoint for the left hand but not for the right hand. No significant main effect or interactions for hemispace were found. This confirms that both sinistral and dextral subjects display pseudoneglect when using their preferred hand and scanning from the left. However, sinistrals, but not dextrals, will display reversed pseudoneglect when using their preferred hand and adopting a scan direction from the right. These results are discussed in terms of the interaction between three factors, whose influence can jointly and severally produce misbisections, hemispheric specialisation for visuospatial function, hemispheric activation for a manual response, and the allocation of visual attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15919545     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.09.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  10 in total

1.  Examining the influence of 'noise' on judgements of spatial extent.

Authors:  Derick F Valadao; Marc Hurwitz; James Danckert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Line bisection by eye and by hand reveal opposite biases.

Authors:  Ute Leonards; Samantha Stone; Christine Mohr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Static versus dynamic judgments of spatial extent.

Authors:  Marc Hurwitz; Derick Valadao; James Danckert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Functional MRI of dynamic judgments of spatial extent.

Authors:  Marc Hurwitz; Derick Valadao; James Danckert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Hysteresis of haptic vertical and straight ahead in healthy human subjects.

Authors:  Alexander A Tarnutzer; Jeanine R Schuler; Christopher J Bockisch; Dominik Straumann
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 3.288

6.  Left hand dominance affects supra-second time processing.

Authors:  Carmelo Mario Vicario; Sonia Bonní; Giacomo Koch
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-24

Review 7.  In (or outside of) your neck of the woods: laterality in spatial body representation.

Authors:  Sylvia Hach; Simone Schütz-Bosbach
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-19

8.  Perceptual asymmetries and handedness: a neglected link?

Authors:  Daniele Marzoli; Giulia Prete; Luca Tommasi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-28

9.  What Are the Contributions of Handedness, Sighting Dominance, Hand Used to Bisect, and Visuospatial Line Processing to the Behavioral Line Bisection Bias?

Authors:  Audrey Ochando; Laure Zago
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-09-12

10.  Individual Differences and Hemispheric Asymmetries for Language and Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Louise O'Regan; Deborah J Serrien
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.