Literature DB >> 15919413

Statistical power and estimation of the number of required subjects for a study based on the t-test: a surgeon's primer.

Edward H Livingston1, Laura Cassidy.   

Abstract

The underlying concepts for calculating the power of a statistical test elude most investigators. Understanding them helps to know how the various factors contributing to statistical power factor into study design when calculating the required number of subjects to enter into a study. Most journals and funding agencies now require a justification for the number of subjects enrolled into a study and investigators must present the principals of powers calculations used to justify these numbers. For these reasons, knowing how statistical power is determined is essential for researchers in the modern era. The number of subjects required for study entry, depends on the following four concepts: 1) The magnitude of the hypothesized effect (i.e., how far apart the two sample means are expected to differ by); 2) the underlying variability of the outcomes measured (standard deviation); 3) the level of significance desired (e.g., alpha = 0.05); 4) the amount of power desired (typically 0.8). If the sample standard deviations are small or the means are expected to be very different then smaller numbers of subjects are required to ensure avoidance of type 1 and 2 errors. This review provides the derivation of the sample size equation for continuous variables when the statistical analysis will be the Student's t-test. We also provide graphical illustrations of how and why these equations are derived.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15919413     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2004.12.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  11 in total

1.  Prevalence of cerebral microhemorrhages in amateur boxers as detected by 3T MR imaging.

Authors:  S Hähnel; C Stippich; I Weber; H Darm; T Schill; J Jost; B Friedmann; S Heiland; M Blatow; U Meyding-Lamadé
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Analysis of variance: is there a difference in means and what does it mean?

Authors:  Lillian S Kao; Charles E Green
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 3.  Sample size estimation in epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Karimollah Hajian-Tilaki
Journal:  Caspian J Intern Med       Date:  2011

4.  Pilot study investigating the ability of an herbal composite to alleviate clinical signs of respiratory dysfunction in horses with recurrent airway obstruction.

Authors:  Wendy Pearson; Armen Charch; Dyanne Brewer; Andrew F Clarke
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.310

5.  The associated expression of Maspin and Bax proteins as a potential prognostic factor in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Antonello A Romani; Paolo Soliani; Silvia Desenzani; Angelo F Borghetti; Pellegrino Crafa
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 6.  Robust optimization in lung treatment plans accounting for geometric uncertainty.

Authors:  Xin Zhang; Yi Rong; Steven Morrill; Jian Fang; Ganesh Narayanasamy; Edvaldo Galhardo; Sanjay Maraboyina; Christopher Croft; Fen Xia; Jose Penagaricano
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Low-Intensity Continuous Ultrasound for the Symptomatic Treatment of Upper Shoulder and Neck Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Stephanie Petterson; Kevin Plancher; Dominic Klyve; David Draper; Ralph Ortiz
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 3.133

8.  Comparison of Floseal® and Tranexamic Acid for Bleeding Control after Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Prospective Randomized Study.

Authors:  Camilo Partezani Helito; Marcelo Batista Bonadio; Marcel Faraco Sobrado; Pedro Nogueira Giglio; José Ricardo Pécora; Gilberto Luis Camanho; Marco Kawamura Demange
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.365

9.  Response: Commentary: Statistical Modeling for the Prediction of Infectious Disease Dissemination With Special Reference to COVID-19 Spread.

Authors:  Subhash Kumar Yadav; Yusuf Akhter
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-01-31

10.  Deep learning tools for the cancer clinic: an open-source framework with head and neck contour validation.

Authors:  John C Asbach; Anurag K Singh; L Shawn Matott; Anh H Le
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.