Literature DB >> 15917444

Use of computer-aided detection (CAD) tools in screening mammography: a multidisciplinary investigation.

E Alberdi1, A A Povyakalo, L Strigini, P Ayton, M Hartswood, R Procter, R Slack.   

Abstract

We summarise a set of analyses and studies conducted to assess the effects of the use of a computer-aided detection (CAD) tool in breast screening. We have used an interdisciplinary approach that combines: (a) statistical analyses inspired by reliability modelling in engineering; (b) experimental studies of decisions of mammography experts using the tool, interpreted in the light of human factors psychology; and (c) ethnographic observations of the use of the tool both in trial conditions and in everyday screening practice. Our investigations have shown patterns of human behaviour and effects of computer-based advice that would not have been revealed by a standard clinical trial approach. For example, we found that the negligible measured effect of CAD could be explained by a range of effects on experts' decisions, beneficial in some cases and detrimental in others. There is some evidence of the latter effects being due to the experts using the computer tool differently from the intentions of the developers. We integrate insights from the different pieces of evidence and highlight their implications for the design, evaluation and deployment of this sort of computer tool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15917444     DOI: 10.1259/bjr/37646417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  6 in total

1.  Exploring the potential of context-sensitive CADe in screening mammography.

Authors:  Georgia D Tourassi; Maciej A Mazurowski; Brian P Harrawood; Elizabeth A Krupinski
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Analog Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) information can be more effective than binary marks.

Authors:  Corbin A Cunningham; Trafton Drew; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Effectiveness of computer-aided detection in community mammography practice.

Authors:  Joshua J Fenton; Linn Abraham; Stephen H Taplin; Berta M Geller; Patricia A Carney; Carl D'Orsi; Joann G Elmore; William E Barlow
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Studying technology use as social practice: the untapped potential of ethnography.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Deborah Swinglehurst
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 8.775

5.  Using computer-aided detection in mammography as a decision support.

Authors:  Maurice Samulski; Rianne Hupse; Carla Boetes; Roel D M Mus; Gerard J den Heeten; Nico Karssemeijer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Variable size computer-aided detection prompts and mammography film reader decisions.

Authors:  Fiona J Gilbert; Susan M Astley; Caroline Rm Boggis; Magnus A McGee; Pamela M Griffiths; Stephen W Duffy; Olorunsola F Agbaje; Maureen Gc Gillan; Mary Wilson; Anil K Jain; Nicola Barr; Ursula M Beetles; Miriam A Griffiths; Jill Johnson; Rita M Roberts; Heather E Deans; Karen A Duncan; Geeta Iyengar
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 6.466

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.