Literature DB >> 15916411

Bilateral decompressive surgery in lumbar spinal stenosis associated with spondylolisthesis: unilateral approach and use of a microscope and tubular retractor system.

Sylvain Palmer1, Robert Turner, Rosemary Palmer.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of treating spondylolisthesis-related spinal stenosis via unilateral approach bilateral decompression in which METRx-MD instrumentation is placed.
METHODS: Eight consecutive patients with spinal stenosis underwent bilateral decompressions via a unilateral approach in which METRx-MD instrumentation was placed. The procedures were performed on an outpatient basis after induction of general anesthesia. The patients underwent preoperative and 3-month postoperative plain radiography in which flexion-extension x-ray films were obtained. Preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging was also performed. All radiographs and neuroimages were read by a single radiologist blinded to the clinical results. Eight vertebral levels in the eight patients were surgically decompressed (in one patient an additional level of nonspondylolisthesis-related stenosis was decompressed). The mean operative time was 92 minutes and the mean blood loss was 33 ml/level. Preoperatively stenosis was severe in five patients, moderate/severe in two, and moderate in one; postoperatively stenosis was absent in five, mild in two, and mild/moderate in one. Motion was detected on flexion-extension radiographs in three patients, but on early (3-month) postoperative radiographs there was no evidence of progression.
CONCLUSIONS: By following the authors' procedure, minimally invasive bilateral decompression of acquired spinal stenosis associated with spondylolisthesis can be successfully performed on an outpatient basis, with reasonable operative times, minimal blood loss, and acceptable morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 15916411     DOI: 10.3171/foc.2002.13.1.5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  16 in total

1.  Clinical applications of the tubular retractor on spinal disorders.

Authors:  Young Baeg Kim; Seung Jae Hyun
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2007-10-20

2.  Unilateral tubular approach for bilateral laminotomy: effect on ipsilateral and contralateral buttock and leg pain.

Authors:  Marjan Alimi; Christoph P Hofstetter; Jose M Torres-Campa; Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez; Guang-Ting Cong; Innocent Njoku; Roger Härtl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Minimal access to deep intracranial lesions using a serial dilatation technique: case-series and review of brain tubular retractor systems.

Authors:  Saleh A Almenawer; Louis Crevier; Naresh Murty; Amin Kassam; Kesava Reddy
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  A comparison of the clinical outcomes of decompression alone and fusion in elderly patients with two-level or more lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Seong Son; Woo Kyung Kim; Sang Gu Lee; Chan Woo Park; Keun Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2013-01-31

5.  Clinical and radiological outcomes following microscopic decompression utilizing tubular retractor or conventional microscopic decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis with a minimum of 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Gun Woo Lee; Soo-Jin Jang; Seung Mok Shin; Jae-Ho Jang; Jae-Do Kim
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-08-10

6.  Health-related quality of life following decompression compared to decompression and fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a Canadian multicentre study.

Authors:  Y Raja Rampersaud; Charles Fisher; Albert Yee; Marcel F Dvorak; Joel Finkelstein; Eugene Wai; Edward Abraham; Stephen J Lewis; David Alexander; William Oxner
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Results and limitations of outpatient and overnight stay laminectomies for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  David Yen; Abdu Albargi
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  "A decade with micro-tubular decompression": Peri-operative complications and surgical outcomes in single and multilevel lumbar canal stenosis.

Authors:  Jwalant Patel; Vishal Kundnani; Suraj Kuriya
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Minimally invasive surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: Two-year follow-up in 54 patients.

Authors:  Sylvain Palmer; Lisa Davison
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-03-24

10.  Predictors of Complications and Unfavorable Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery Treatment in Elderly Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Spine Pathologies (Case Series).

Authors:  Vladimir Klimov; Aleksey Evsyukov; Evgeniya Amelina; Sergey Ryabykh; Alexander Simonovich
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-04-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.